Skip to content
Geist logo
LendingInactive

Geist Finance Review: Why You Should Avoid It

Geist Finance was a Fantom lending protocol, but it permanently shut down in 2023 after losses linked to the Multichain exploit. Don’t deposit or rely on it as an active service.

By the SkyBitcoins review team · Updated

SkyBitcoins rating

Quick take

Geist Finance is not worth using: the Fantom lending protocol permanently shut down in 2023 after losses linked to the Multichain exploit. Its former purpose was crypto lending, but there is no confirmed active service, current fee schedule or withdrawal route to rely on. Don’t deposit or approve transactions for it. If you have an old position, verify its on-chain status cautiously and treat unsolicited recovery offers as a risk.

Ratings

How Geist rates

Trust
1.0/10
Track record, licensing, audits and how your funds are held.
Value
1.0/10
Fees, odds, rewards and bonuses: what you get for your money.
Usability
0.0/10
How easy it is to sign up, deposit, play or trade, and withdraw.
Transparency
3.0/10
How clearly the team, terms, fees and risks are disclosed.

Ratings run from 0 to 10 and use only facts we could check. Where the information isn't public we show n/a instead of guessing.

At a glance

Geist key facts

Geist key facts
TypeDecentralized lending protocol
ChainFantom
TokenGEIST
StatusPermanently shut down in 2023
Closure reasonLosses linked to the Multichain exploit
Domain mismatchGeist.com is a Canadian literary magazine
Updated

Is it for you?

Who Geist suits

Good for

  • People researching the history of Fantom lending protocols
  • Former users checking what to verify about an old Geist Finance position

Not for

  • Anyone looking for an active place to lend or borrow crypto
  • Users who need a confirmed withdrawal or recovery process
  • People seeking a current Fantom lending app

What could you do with Geist Finance?

Geist Finance was a decentralized lending protocol on Fantom. Lending protocols generally let users supply crypto to liquidity pools and borrow against collateral, but Geist Finance is permanently shut down, so you should not treat those functions as currently available. GEIST was its associated token; the project’s present token utility and any active governance are not established. There is also an important naming trap: Geist.com is a Canadian magazine about ideas and culture, not the Fantom lending service. Don’t use that magazine’s subscription or purchase options as though they belonged to a crypto app. The useful takeaway is historical, not practical: Geist Finance once operated in crypto lending, but it is not a current option for opening a position.

What would Geist Finance cost you?

Geist Finance does not publish a current fee schedule for an active service, because the protocol has permanently shut down. Its historical lending rates, borrowing costs, liquidation parameters and any transaction-level charges are not established here, so don’t assume old figures still apply or use them to plan a position. A lending protocol may involve network transaction costs as well as borrowing interest and other protocol-specific charges, but those general costs do not tell you what Geist charged. Most importantly, a low historical rate would not make a deposit safe now: the service’s closure and the exploit-related losses are the central decision points. Don’t send funds in search of a yield, and don’t pay a supposed “unlock,” recovery or withdrawal fee without independently confirming that the request is legitimate.

Can you trust Geist Finance with funds now?

Geist Finance’s permanent closure followed significant losses linked to the Multichain exploit, a serious incident for anyone considering the protocol or holding a legacy position. The protocol was described as non-custodial, meaning users typically interacted with smart contracts rather than handing funds to a conventional account custodian. That does not eliminate smart-contract, bridge or operational risks, and it does not guarantee that funds can be recovered after a shutdown. Current audit details, licence information, security guarantees and a recovery plan are not established. Given the closure and exploit-related losses, trust is too low to recommend using the protocol. Be cautious of anyone presenting themselves as Geist support or promising guaranteed recovery; verify claims independently and never share a seed phrase or private key.

How should former users handle an old position?

You should not start a new Geist Finance position. The protocol is inactive, and there is no confirmed current sign-up, lending, borrowing or withdrawal flow to recommend. Do not connect a wallet or approve a transaction just because an old interface, social post or search listing appears to be available; an interface being reachable would not prove that its contracts remain safe or supported. If you previously supplied assets or borrowed against collateral, first establish which wallet and Fantom address you used, then check the relevant on-chain position and contract status using sources you independently trust. Don’t make a rushed transaction based on a message from a stranger. If you cannot verify what a transaction will do, do not sign it. There is no confirmed recovery route to promise former users.

What should you use instead of Geist Finance?

Geist Finance is not a suitable choice if you need a working lending market, a published current cost structure or a dependable support and withdrawal process. The project’s closure makes everyday usability beside the point: there is no active service to recommend, and present mobile support, wallet compatibility and transaction speed are not established. Keep the identity distinction clear, too. Geist.com is a Canadian magazine that publishes writing and culture, while Geist Finance was the Fantom lending protocol. The magazine’s active content does not mean the crypto protocol has reopened. If you want to lend or borrow on Fantom, choose an independently verified protocol that is currently operating and review its contracts, audits, fees, collateral rules and withdrawal conditions before connecting a wallet.

3 steps

How to start with Geist

  1. 1

    Do not deposit into Geist Finance or approve new transactions for it.

  2. 2

    If you have an old position, identify the wallet and Fantom address involved and verify the on-chain status independently.

  3. 3

    Do not share your seed phrase or private key, and treat unsolicited recovery offers or fee requests as suspicious.

Geist FAQs

Is Geist Finance still active?

No. Geist Finance announced its permanent closure in 2023 after losses linked to the Multichain exploit. Treat it as an inactive protocol, not a place to open a new lending position.

Why did Geist Finance shut down?

The closure was attributed to significant losses resulting from the Multichain exploit. That explains the reported reason for shutting down, but does not establish whether every user’s funds or position was recovered.

Can I withdraw funds from Geist Finance?

There is no confirmed withdrawal process or recovery route in the project details here. If you have an old position, check its on-chain status carefully and don’t trust anyone promising recovery without independently verifying the claim.

Is Geist.com the Geist Finance lending app?

The Geist.com site is a Canadian magazine about ideas and culture, not the Fantom lending protocol. The domain and the crypto project should not be treated as the same service.

Compare

Geist alternatives

All alternatives

Aave

Lending

Score 7.7 out of 10

Aave offers open crypto lending and borrowing, but variable rates, gas costs and liquidation risk make it best for informed DeFi users.

Ethereum
Aave V3 logo

Aave V3

Lending

Score 7.6 out of 10

Aave V3 offers non-custodial lending and collateralised borrowing, but rates vary and deposits remain exposed to DeFi and liquidation risks.

TVL $15.8B+3.4%Ethereum · Base · Arbitrum +18
Compound V3 logoScore 7.2 out of 10

Compound V3 offers variable-rate crypto lending across several networks, but market terms and liquidation risks require close checking.

TVL $1.25B−3.3%Ethereum · Arbitrum · Base +7
Aave V4 logo

Aave V4

Lending

Score 7.1 out of 10

Aave V4 offers non-custodial lending and collateralized borrowing, but rates vary and smart-contract, market and liquidation risks remain.

TVL $810M+19.1%Ethereum · Arc · Avalanche +1
Euler V2 logo

Euler V2

Lending

Score 7.1 out of 10

Euler V2 offers configurable lending markets across many chains, but check each vault’s rates, liquidity and liquidation rules before depositing.

TVL $267M−0.9%Monad · Ethereum · Base +13
Morpho Blue logoScore 7.0 out of 10

Morpho Blue offers non-custodial lending markets and curated vaults, but rates change and supplied assets face smart-contract, oracle and market risks.

TVL $10.9B−0.4%Ethereum · Base · Robinhood Chain +41

Same category

More Lending dApps

Lending rankings
SparkLend logo

SparkLend

Lending

Score 7.0 out of 10

SparkLend offers governance-set on-chain borrowing rates, but check each market’s live terms and liquidation risks before supplying collateral.

TVL $5.00B+1.1%Ethereum · xDai

Morpho

Lending

Score 6.8 out of 10

Morpho offers variable-rate and fixed-term lending plus curated vaults, but check each product’s fees, terms and risks before depositing.

Ethereum · Base
Euler Finance logoScore 6.8 out of 10

Euler offers flexible crypto lending and market-building tools, but check each market’s fees, collateral rules and risks before depositing.

Ethereum
Nolus Protocol logoScore 6.6 out of 10

Nolus offers fixed-rate, asset-backed spot margin, but check live borrowing costs and liquidation terms before using leverage.

TVL $457K−1.4%Solana · Neutron · Osmosis
Dolomite logo

Dolomite

Lending

Score 6.5 out of 10

Dolomite offers multi-network lending, borrowing, swaps and strategies, but variable rates, liquidation and contract risks call for care.

TVL $142M−19.6%Ethereum · Arbitrum · Berachain +4
NAVI Lending logoScore 6.5 out of 10

NAVI offers variable-rate lending and collateralized borrowing on Sui, but users must weigh liquidation, smart-contract and liquidity risks.

TVL $126M−11.2%Sui

Same chain

More on Fantom

Fantom rankings
Bitget logo

Bitget

Centralized Exchanges

Score 6.8 out of 10

Bitget combines crypto trading tools with other asset products, but check fees, local access and custodial risks before depositing.

TVL $5.78B−0.1%Bitcoin · Solana · Ethereum +68
Drpc logo

Drpc

Infrastructure

Score 6.8 out of 10

dRPC offers managed multichain RPC and self-hosted tools; verify plan limits and security terms before relying on it for production traffic.

Ethereum · BNB Chain · Polygon +18
vfat.io logo

vfat.io

Yield Aggregator

Score 6.5 out of 10

vfat.io combines multi-chain yield discovery and portfolio tools with non-custodial position automation, but check costs and contract risks first.

TVL $31.3M−2.9%Base · Ethereum · Hyperliquid L1 +33
LayerZero V2 logoScore 6.3 out of 10

LayerZero V2 powers cross-chain features in other apps; compare the exact route, fee and security settings before sending funds.

TVL $17.5B+3.4%Polygon · Ethereum · ApeChain +76
WOOFi Swap logoScore 6.3 out of 10

WOOFi offers wallet-based swaps across many networks, but compare each quote and check contract and cross-chain risks before signing.

TVL $3.25M−5.2%Arbitrum · Optimism · Avalanche +13
Phantom Finance logoScore 6.3 out of 10

Phantom combines a self-custodial wallet with trading and payment features, but check costs, terms and transaction details before using it.

Fantom · Solana · Ethereum +3

How we checked

Sources

No public sources were recorded for this page.

Last updated . Spotted an error? Tell us and we will correct it.