Skip to content
OtherInactive

Conic Review: Should You Use This Inactive Protocol?

Conic was an Ethereum protocol for spreading single-asset deposits across Curve pools. It is listed as inactive and its site flags a shutdown, so it is not a sensible place to make new deposits.

By the SkyBitcoins review team · Updated

SkyBitcoins rating

Quick take

Conic is not a good choice for new deposits: it is listed as inactive, and its site flags a shutdown. Its Omnipools were designed to spread one asset across Curve pools, but current deposit and withdrawal availability, fees, and audit status are not established. If you already have funds there, confirm the position and withdrawal route through official channels before approving a transaction.

Ratings

How Conic rates

Trust
1.5/10
Track record, licensing, audits and how your funds are held.
Value
2.0/10
Fees, odds, rewards and bonuses: what you get for your money.
Usability
1.0/10
How easy it is to sign up, deposit, play or trade, and withdraw.
Transparency
3.0/10
How clearly the team, terms, fees and risks are disclosed.

Ratings run from 0 to 10 and use only facts we could check. Where the information isn't public we show n/a instead of guessing.

At a glance

Conic key facts

Conic key facts
TypeCurve yield allocation protocol
StatusInactive; site flags a shutdown
ChainEthereum
PoolsOmnipools allocated assets across Curve pools
TokenCNC
FeesCurrent schedule not established
Updated

Is it for you?

Who Conic suits

Good for

  • Former Conic users checking what the Omnipool design was intended to do
  • CNC holders researching Conic's historical protocol features
  • Existing depositors investigating their position before taking further action

Not for

  • Anyone looking to deposit into an active yield protocol; Conic is listed as inactive and its site flags a shutdown
  • Users who need clear current withdrawal options, fees, or audit information before entrusting funds to a protocol

What could you do with Conic's Omnipools?

Conic was an Ethereum protocol built around Omnipools. A depositor could put in a single underlying asset, and the pool would allocate that asset across multiple Curve pools. The stated aim was to diversify exposure to yield opportunities in the Curve ecosystem without requiring the depositor to choose each Curve pool directly.

That describes the protocol's intended design, not a service you should assume is usable now. Conic is listed as inactive, and its site displays a shutdown announcement. Do not treat historical documentation or an accessible interface as proof that deposits, withdrawals, or other functions are currently operating. If you are researching the project, the Omnipool model is the central feature to understand; if you want a live yield product, look elsewhere.

What could using Conic cost you?

A current Conic fee schedule is not established. For a protocol of this kind, costs can include Ethereum gas for approving tokens and interacting with contracts, as well as any protocol or underlying-pool charges. Those costs may vary with network conditions and the specific transaction. Do not assume that a historical fee description, if you find one, applies to the protocol today.

Yield is not a guaranteed return. Allocating assets across Curve pools can still leave you exposed to the risks of the underlying pools and the contracts that manage the allocation. With Conic inactive, the key value question is not just whether its past yield could justify costs: it is whether a safe, functioning route to manage or withdraw a position remains. Check that before spending gas or signing any transaction.

Can you trust Conic with funds now?

Conic's inactive status and shutdown announcement are major reasons not to entrust it with new funds. Omnipools rely on smart contracts to hold and allocate assets, so contract vulnerabilities or problems in the underlying Curve pools can put deposited funds at risk. DeFi users generally interact directly with contracts from a wallet, rather than relying on a conventional bank account or a guaranteed recovery process.

The available details do not establish a current audit status, licence, or present-day security arrangements. That means you should not infer that an audit link or past security material proves the protocol is safe to use now. Do not approve a token allowance or connect a wallet just because the site or an old interface remains reachable. For an existing position, verify the contract and the current status of any withdrawal path independently before acting.

Can you still use Conic with an Ethereum wallet?

Conic was an Ethereum application, so using it would have required an Ethereum-compatible wallet and on-chain transactions. Those transactions require gas, and approvals can give a contract permission to use tokens. Review the contract and the exact permission requested before signing; do not approve an unfamiliar or unexpected request.

The site flags a shutdown and Conic is listed as inactive. As a result, you should not assume the interface, mobile experience, or transaction flows remain available or maintained. The published details do not establish current wallet support, transaction speed, or a working deposit and withdrawal flow. An old interface loading in a browser is not confirmation that it can safely manage funds. If you are trying to resolve an existing position, use official project communications to confirm the current process rather than relying on outdated instructions.

What should existing Conic depositors check first?

Conic's shutdown status makes it unsuitable for new deposits. For existing users, the immediate concern is whether funds remain in a contract and whether a valid withdrawal function is available. Withdrawal limits, timing, and the current state of any such function are not established, so do not assume that an old guide describes what will happen today.

Start by identifying the exact wallet and contract involved, then check for current official guidance. Confirm that any transaction is actually a withdrawal from the position you hold, and inspect the destination address and token amounts before signing. Never share a seed phrase or private key with anyone claiming to help. If you cannot verify a transaction or the contract, pause rather than risk sending more funds or granting additional permissions.

Does CNC still have an active role in Conic?

CNC is Conic's token. Conic v2 documentation describes a 52-week bonding mechanism, but that is a historical design detail, not evidence that bonding remains live or that CNC currently grants access to an operating product. Token listings and price pages also do not establish the condition or utility of the underlying protocol.

If you hold CNC, separate token-market questions from protocol-use questions. Conic is inactive, and there is no basis here to rely on future features, revenue, or a return from bonding. Check current official communications and the token contract details before attempting any interaction. Do not make a decision based only on old descriptions of v2 features or on a quoted token price, which can change quickly.

4 steps

How to start with Conic

  1. 1

    Do not make a new deposit while Conic is listed as inactive and its site flags a shutdown.

  2. 2

    If you have an existing position, identify the wallet and contract holding it without sharing your seed phrase or private key.

  3. 3

    Check current official project communications for a confirmed withdrawal route; do not rely on old interface instructions.

  4. 4

    Before signing any transaction, verify the contract, action, token amounts, and destination. Pause if you cannot confirm what the transaction does.

Conic FAQs

What did Conic Finance do?

Conic used Omnipools to allocate a single underlying asset across multiple Curve pools. The aim was to give depositors exposure to yield from the Curve ecosystem.

Is Conic Finance still active?

Conic is listed as inactive, and its official site carries a shutdown announcement. Treat it as unavailable for new deposits unless the project clearly confirms otherwise through an official channel.

Can you withdraw funds from Conic?

The published information here does not establish Conic's current deposit, withdrawal, or fee status. If you already have a position, verify the relevant contract and current withdrawal options before signing anything.

What is the CNC token used for?

CNC is Conic's token. Conic v2 documentation describes a 52-week bonding mechanism, but that does not establish that bonding is currently available or that CNC has a current use within an active protocol.

What are Conic's fees and risks?

No current fee schedule or clear audit status is established here. Ethereum transactions also require gas, and depositing into DeFi protocols can expose funds to smart-contract and underlying-pool risks.

Compare

Conic alternatives

All alternatives
Flood logo

Flood

Other

Score 6.2 out of 10

Flood routes FLOOD swaps through Uniswap v4 pools whose reserves earn variable Aave yield, with a 0.3% fee and significant DeFi risks.

Ethereum
Juicebox V1 logoScore 5.8 out of 10

Juicebox lets Ethereum projects set programmable funding and payout rules, but check each project’s terms, contract version and costs before contributing.

TVL $11.5M−1.3%Ethereum
Royco V2 logoScore 5.8 out of 10

Royco V2 offers onchain yield tranches, but you need to verify each market’s loss exposure, costs and exit terms before depositing.

TVL $6.54M−55.7%Ethereum · Avalanche · Base +1
Royco V1 logoScore 5.8 out of 10

Royco V1 offers tranche-based DeFi yield allocation, but check market-specific loss coverage, liquidity and unpublished fees before depositing.

TVL $1.53M−0.0%Arbitrum · Ethereum · Sonic +5
Juicebox V3 logoScore 5.5 out of 10

Juicebox V3 offers programmable Ethereum project funding, but check each project’s terms and confirm fees and V3-specific audit coverage first.

TVL $124K−0.8%Ethereum
Tron Discount logoScore 5.5 out of 10

Tron Discount lets TRON users buy or lease Energy, but check the unclear price unit and security disclosures before connecting.

Tron

Same category

More Other dApps

Other rankings
Packs logo

Packs

Other

Score 5.4 out of 10

Packed bundles coin launches and trading tools, but check the locker’s separate signing service and transaction costs before funding it.

Robinhood Chain · Ethereum · Solana
Hypepad logo

Hypepad

Other

Score 5.3 out of 10

HypePad routes Pump.fun creator fees into Hyperliquid strategies, but costs and custody safeguards are not fully published.

Solana · Hyperliquid L1
Bio Protocol logoScore 5.1 out of 10

Bio Protocol links research, project funding and product sales, but its audit, custody and fee details need checking before you commit funds.

TVL $2.67M−7.0%Ethereum · Base
Keep3r Network logoScore 5.0 out of 10

Keep3r Network connects Ethereum smart-contract jobs with external keepers, but beta status and uncertain job economics require care.

TVL $120K−4.7%Ethereum
Strata logo

Strata

Other

Score 5.0 out of 10

Strata splits yield into senior and junior tranches, but check each product’s fees, risks, liquidity and terms before depositing.

Vita logo

Vita

Other

Score 5.0 out of 10

VitaDAO funds early longevity research and offers a separate health-record app, but token utility and key trust details need checking.

Ethereum

Same chain

More on Ethereum

Ethereum rankings
Lido logo

Lido

Staking Pool

Score 7.8 out of 10

Lido turns staked ETH into liquid stETH, but variable rewards, a 10% reward fee and withdrawal and contract risks need checking.

TVL $21.7B−1.1%Ethereum · Solana · Terra +2
Bitvavo logo

Bitvavo

Centralized Exchanges

Score 7.7 out of 10

Bitvavo offers euro funding, 400+ crypto assets and Pro Mode, but check withdrawal terms and the separate risks of staking and leverage.

TVL $311M−13.3%Ethereum · Bitcoin · Solana +9

Aave

Lending

Score 7.7 out of 10

Aave offers open crypto lending and borrowing, but variable rates, gas costs and liquidation risk make it best for informed DeFi users.

Ethereum
Aave V3 logo

Aave V3

Lending

Score 7.6 out of 10

Aave V3 offers non-custodial lending and collateralised borrowing, but rates vary and deposits remain exposed to DeFi and liquidation risks.

TVL $15.8B+3.4%Ethereum · Base · Arbitrum +18
Getblock logo

Getblock

Infrastructure

Score 7.4 out of 10

GetBlock suits teams needing multi-chain RPC and data services, but check usage billing, coverage and SLA terms before relying on it in production.

Bitcoin · XRP Ledger · Ethereum +3
Uniswap logo

Uniswap

DEXes

Score 7.4 out of 10

Uniswap offers wallet-based swaps and liquidity pools across 15+ networks, but pool fees, gas and self-custody risks still matter.

Ethereum · Base · Arbitrum +2

How we checked

Sources

  1. mathmonks.com/cone/conic-sections(opens in a new tab)
  2. britannica.com/science/conic-section(opens in a new tab)
  3. merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conic(opens in a new tab)

Last updated . Spotted an error? Tell us and we will correct it.