Balancer V2 Review: Is It Safe to Use?
Balancer V2 is a multi-chain decentralized exchange and liquidity protocol, but a major 2025 exploit makes contract risk the key question before you use it.
By the SkyBitcoins review team · Updated
Quick take
Balancer V2 may suit experienced EVM users who want on-chain swaps or liquidity pools, but the 2025 exploit is a serious reason to be cautious. Pool fees vary, and you also pay network gas; liquidity providers face price and contract risks. Before connecting a wallet or depositing, confirm you are using the intended V2 pool on the correct chain and check its current status and contract details.
Ratings
How Balancer V2 rates
- Trust
- 2.0/10
- Track record, licensing, audits and how your funds are held.
- Value
- 5.0/10
- Fees, odds, rewards and bonuses: what you get for your money.
- Usability
- n/a
- How easy it is to sign up, deposit, play or trade, and withdraw.
- Transparency
- 4.0/10
- How clearly the team, terms, fees and risks are disclosed.
Ratings run from 0 to 10 and use only facts we could check. Where the information isn't public we show n/a instead of guessing.
At a glance
Balancer V2 key facts
| Type | Decentralized exchange and liquidity protocol |
|---|---|
| Chains | Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base and others |
| Token | BAL |
| Custody | Smart-contract based; users connect their own wallet |
| Fees | Pool fees vary; network gas also applies |
| Audits | Two audits are listed |
| Security | Balancer V2 was affected by a 2025 exploit |
| Value locked | $16.7M−0.6% 7d |
| Updated |
Is it for you?
Who Balancer V2 suits
Good for
- EVM users who want to swap through on-chain liquidity pools
- Experienced liquidity providers who understand pool and smart-contract risks
Not for
- New DeFi users who cannot assess pool contracts and token risks
- Anyone unwilling to accept smart-contract risk after the 2025 exploit
- Users who need fixed, clearly published swap fees before trading
What can you do with Balancer V2?
Balancer V2 is a decentralized exchange protocol built around smart-contract pools. You can use those pools to swap tokens, or supply tokens as liquidity and receive a portion of the pool's swap fees. Pools can hold multiple assets and use different token weightings, so they are not all equivalent to a simple two-token, equal-weight pool. Check the pool's assets and configuration before depositing; the pool design determines what exposure you take on.
Balancer lists Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base, Gnosis, Avalanche, Mode, Fraxtal and Polygon zkEVM. Availability can differ by pool and chain, so seeing a network in the protocol list does not mean every asset or pool is deployed there. BAL is the protocol's token, but the information here does not establish that holding BAL is required to swap or provide liquidity.
What will a Balancer V2 swap or deposit cost?
There is no single fee that applies to every Balancer V2 pool. The pool's swap fee affects the amount a trader receives, while liquidity providers may earn a share of those swap fees. Check the fee shown for the specific pool before you trade or supply assets; do not assume a fee from one pool applies to another. Balancer does not publish a universal fee schedule in the details for this review.
You also pay network gas for on-chain actions such as swaps, token approvals and deposits. Gas varies with network demand and is separate from the pool fee. Providing liquidity is not a guaranteed yield: token prices can move relative to one another, changing the value of your position compared with simply holding the tokens. Consider both fee income and that price exposure before depositing.
Can you trust Balancer V2 with your funds after the exploit?
Treat the November 2025 exploit as a major warning. Balancer V2 was among the protocols affected in an attack reported across multiple blockchains; the reported roughly $128 million figure covered the broader attack, not a confirmed V2-only loss. Governance search results refer to proposals about rescued funds, but that alone does not establish how much was recovered or whether a particular pool is now safe. Check current pool and protocol notices before interacting.
Two audits are listed for Balancer, but an audit is not a guarantee against vulnerabilities, and the audit details are not identified here. Balancer is non-custodial in the usual DEX sense: you connect a wallet and transactions interact with smart contracts rather than handing funds to a conventional exchange. That still leaves your funds exposed to contract bugs, malicious tokens, compromised approvals and wallet mistakes. Keep only the amount you can afford to risk in an interaction.
What is it like to use Balancer V2 with a wallet?
Using a DEX generally means connecting a compatible wallet, selecting the relevant network and approving token or pool interactions yourself. Balancer supports several EVM networks, but you need the correct network's native token to pay gas. A transaction on one chain does not automatically move assets to another, and a pool's availability and assets can differ across networks.
Before signing, read the wallet prompt and confirm the network, token amounts, recipient or contract, and any requested spending allowance. Token approvals can remain active after a swap, so review and revoke allowances you no longer need using a trusted wallet feature or a reputable allowance-management tool. Balancer does not publish usability, transaction-speed or mobile-app details in the information summarized here, so check that your wallet and the specific pool interface work for your setup before committing meaningful funds.
When should you choose a different exchange?
Balancer V2 is a poor fit if you want a low-risk place to park funds, a fixed fee across all trades, or a simple savings product. Liquidity provision can expose you to token-price changes as well as contract risk, and swap fees are pool-specific. The 2025 incident also means you should not rely on the protocol's history or audit count alone when deciding whether a contract is safe.
If you cannot verify the exact pool, chain and contract you intend to use, do not proceed. Avoid links or tokens promoted in unsolicited messages, and never sign a transaction you do not understand. If you still choose to interact, start with a small transaction and monitor the pool's status. There is no need to use Balancer V2 simply because a pool is available: a centralized exchange or a different on-chain venue may better suit users who prioritize support, clearer pricing or lower smart-contract exposure.
5 steps
How to start with Balancer V2
- 1
Open Balancer through a trusted route and confirm you are selecting Balancer V2, not a different version or a lookalike site.
- 2
Check the current status of the specific pool and chain, especially in light of the November 2025 exploit.
- 3
Inspect the pool's tokens, configuration and fee, and make sure you understand the price and contract risks.
- 4
Connect a compatible wallet on the correct network and keep enough native tokens for gas.
- 5
Read every approval and transaction prompt; test with a small amount before a larger swap or liquidity deposit.
Balancer V2 FAQs
What is Balancer V2?
Balancer V2 pools are smart contracts that hold tokens and enable swaps. You can trade through pools or supply assets to a pool and earn a share of swap fees, with risks including price divergence and contract failure.
Which networks does Balancer V2 support?
Balancer lists Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base, Gnosis, Avalanche, Mode, Fraxtal and Polygon zkEVM. Confirm the selected pool and network in your wallet before approving a transaction.
What does Balancer V2 charge?
Balancer does not publish one universal swap fee in the details available for this review; fees can vary by pool. You also pay network gas, and liquidity providers may face losses if token prices move apart.
Was Balancer V2 hacked?
Balancer V2 was affected by a major exploit in November 2025. The reported attack involved multiple chains and Balancer forks; do not assume a pool is safe just because it remains accessible or has previously been audited.
How do you use Balancer V2 safely?
You generally need a compatible EVM wallet with the correct network's native token for gas. Check the pool contract and asset list, then consider testing with a small amount before making a larger swap or deposit.
Compare
Balancer V2 alternatives
Uniswap offers wallet-based swaps and liquidity pools across 15+ networks, but pool fees, gas and self-custody risks still matter.
Uniswap V2 enables wallet-based swaps and liquidity provision, but check the pool, network, gas and token risks before you trade.
Uniswap V3 offers wallet-based token swaps and concentrated liquidity, but check pool fees, gas, execution risks and price-range exposure.
Uniswap v4 offers multichain swaps and customizable pools, but check each pool’s fees, hook behavior and risks before trading.
THORChain enables self-custody swaps across supported chains, but variable fees and protocol risks make quote-checking essential.
XRPL DEX offers native order-book and AMM trading, but you need a separate wallet and interface and must check each asset and pool.
Same category
More DEXes
Stellar DEX offers native trading and path payments, but costs, liquidity and asset controls depend on the market, issuer and wallet you choose.
Osmosis offers wallet-based swaps and liquidity pools for Cosmos assets, but check route costs, liquidity and protocol risks before trading.
Aerodrome combines Base token swaps, liquidity pools and AERO voting, but pool fees and smart-contract risks deserve a close check.
SaucerSwap offers Hedera swaps, limit orders and liquidity, but check transaction costs and pool risks before connecting your wallet.
THORChain offers self-custody swaps across supported chains, but variable gas and liquidity fees and protocol risks deserve a careful check.
SaucerSwap V2 offers self-custody swaps and concentrated-liquidity pools on Hedera, but check fees, price ranges and contract risks first.
Same chain
More on Ethereum
Lido turns staked ETH into liquid stETH, but variable rewards, a 10% reward fee and withdrawal and contract risks need checking.
Bitvavo offers euro funding, 400+ crypto assets and Pro Mode, but check withdrawal terms and the separate risks of staking and leverage.
Aave offers open crypto lending and borrowing, but variable rates, gas costs and liquidation risk make it best for informed DeFi users.
Aave V3 offers non-custodial lending and collateralised borrowing, but rates vary and deposits remain exposed to DeFi and liquidation risks.
GetBlock suits teams needing multi-chain RPC and data services, but check usage billing, coverage and SLA terms before relying on it in production.
Arbitrum Bridge is a direct way to move supported assets between Ethereum and Arbitrum One, but Ethereum withdrawals typically take around seven days.
How we checked
Sources
Last updated . Spotted an error? Tell us and we will correct it.