ZKcandy Bridge Review: What to Check Before Using It
ZKcandy is a canonical bridge associated with the ZKcandy gaming network, but its supported assets, fees and transfer process aren’t established well enough for a full review.
By the SkyBitcoins review team · Updated
At a glance
ZKcandy Bridge key facts
| Type | Canonical bridge |
|---|---|
| Network | Ethereum; ZKcandy is an Ethereum-based gaming L2 |
| Audit | No audit listed |
| Token | CANDY |
| Value locked | $40.8K−0.8% 7d |
| Updated |
ZKcandy Bridge FAQs
What is ZKcandy Bridge?
ZKcandy is described as a gaming-focused Ethereum Layer 2 built with ZKsync technology. The bridge is classified as a canonical bridge, but its supported routes and transfer details aren’t published here.
What does it cost to use ZKcandy Bridge?
Fees, supported tokens, transfer times and withdrawal limits aren’t published. Check the bridge interface and confirm the current costs and route before approving a transaction.
Is ZKcandy Bridge safe to use?
No audit is listed, and the bridge’s custody and security arrangements aren’t established. Don’t deposit funds until you can verify the bridge contract, route and withdrawal process independently.
Compare
ZKcandy Bridge alternatives
Arbitrum Bridge is a direct way to move supported assets between Ethereum and Arbitrum One, but Ethereum withdrawals typically take around seven days.
Arbitrum Nova Bridge offers a canonical Ethereum–Nova route, but check fees and allow time for withdrawals back to Ethereum.
Zircuit offers an Ethereum-compatible L2 and yield products, but check vault risks, fees and withdrawal terms before depositing.
Polygon Bridge moves assets between Ethereum and Polygon, but check supported tokens, quoted costs and transfer risks before you send.
Base Bridge connects Ethereum and Base, but check the supported asset, transaction costs and bridge risks before moving funds.
Lens Chain connects Web3 social apps through a shared account, but check fees, permissions and security details before using it.
Same category
More Canonical Bridges
Linea Bridge offers native, aggregator, exchange and purchase routes, but check the total cost and limited published security details before sending funds.
Ink Bridge offers an official ETH route from Ethereum to Ink, but its fees, custody model and audit details are not published.
RSK Bridge connects Rootstock and Ethereum, but check route-specific fees, supported tokens and security details before transferring.
Eclipse is an SVM-based Ethereum Layer 2 with a bridge, but verify the route, costs and withdrawal details before transferring assets.
StarkGate is Starknet’s canonical Ethereum bridge, but check supported tokens, fees and security disclosures before transferring.
Mantle Bridge offers an official Ethereum–Mantle route, but fees, timing and audit details are limited; review the transaction before signing.
Same chain
More on Ethereum
Lido turns staked ETH into liquid stETH, but variable rewards, a 10% reward fee and withdrawal and contract risks need checking.
Bitvavo offers euro funding, 400+ crypto assets and Pro Mode, but check withdrawal terms and the separate risks of staking and leverage.
Aave offers open crypto lending and borrowing, but variable rates, gas costs and liquidation risk make it best for informed DeFi users.
Aave V3 offers non-custodial lending and collateralised borrowing, but rates vary and deposits remain exposed to DeFi and liquidation risks.
GetBlock suits teams needing multi-chain RPC and data services, but check usage billing, coverage and SLA terms before relying on it in production.
Uniswap offers wallet-based swaps and liquidity pools across 15+ networks, but pool fees, gas and self-custody risks still matter.
How we checked
Sources
Last updated . Spotted an error? Tell us and we will correct it.