Skip to content
Sanctum Validator LSTs logo
StakingActive

Sanctum Validator LSTs Review: Is SOL Liquid Staking Worth It?

Sanctum Validator LSTs let you stake SOL through liquid staking tokens on Solana. The advertised 5.49% APY is not enough to judge returns: check the specific pool, fees and risks before you deposit.

By the SkyBitcoins review team · Updated

Quick take

Sanctum Validator LSTs may suit Solana holders who want a liquid staking token and are comfortable comparing individual pools. The main reason to consider them is access to SOL staking through tokens issued by validator stake pools. Sanctum advertises 5.49% APY, but does not publish fees for these LSTs or list an audit. Before depositing, check the exact pool’s yield, commission, redemption options and risks.

Ratings

How Sanctum Validator LSTs rates

Trust
4.0/10
Track record, licensing, audits and how your funds are held.
Value
5.0/10
Fees, odds, rewards and bonuses: what you get for your money.
Usability
5.5/10
How easy it is to sign up, deposit, play or trade, and withdraw.
Transparency
4.5/10
How clearly the team, terms, fees and risks are disclosed.

Ratings run from 0 to 10 and use only facts we could check. Where the information isn't public we show n/a instead of guessing.

At a glance

Sanctum Validator LSTs key facts

Sanctum Validator LSTs key facts
TypeSolana validator liquid staking tokens
NetworkSolana
TokenSANC; role in LST staking unspecified
Advertised APY5.49% for SOL liquid staking
FeesNot published for validator LSTs
AuditsNo audit listed for these validator LSTs
Stake poolsDeployed with the SanctumSPL Program
Value locked$1.58B−5.8% 7d
Updated

Is it for you?

Who Sanctum Validator LSTs suits

Good for

  • Solana users who want a liquid staking token instead of leaving SOL unstaked
  • Users comparing validator-specific LST pools and willing to review each pool’s terms
  • Solana teams exploring a custom LST or white-label validator through Sanctum’s institutional offering

Not for

  • Anyone who needs guaranteed returns or a fixed APY
  • Users who want a published fee schedule and audit record before considering a deposit
  • People who need to redeem SOL instantly at a guaranteed value

What do you get when you stake SOL through Sanctum?

Sanctum Validator LSTs are liquid staking tokens for Solana. Their stake pools are deployed with the SanctumSPL Program. Rather than leaving SOL idle, you stake through a pool and receive its liquid staking token, which represents a claim on a staked position. The token can remain in your wallet, but its usefulness and market price depend on the particular pool and where that token is accepted.

Sanctum’s site promotes SOL liquid staking and names JupSOL and bbSOL among the available options, alongside other LSTs. It also advertises a 5.49% APY, but that headline should not be treated as a guaranteed rate for every validator LST. Compare the specific token and pool you intend to use, including its validator, current yield and redemption process. If you plan to use the LST in another app, check that app supports the exact token.

What could reduce your Sanctum LST returns?

Sanctum advertises 5.49% APY for SOL liquid staking, but does not publish a fee schedule for its validator LSTs. That leaves important costs to verify for the specific pool: any validator commission, the cost of swapping SOL for an LST or back, and Solana transaction fees. If you trade through a market rather than redeem directly, the token’s price may also differ from the value of its underlying stake.

Before you confirm a deposit, review the transaction and the pool’s current terms. Compare the amount of SOL going in with the LST amount you expect to receive, and check whether the displayed APY is net of commissions. Treat the rate as variable, not promised income. If those details are unclear for a pool, don’t assume that Sanctum’s headline APY tells you what you will earn.

How much should you trust a Sanctum validator pool?

A liquid staking token is not the same as holding unstaked SOL: your position relies on the pool’s contracts and on the validator staking the underlying SOL. Possible concerns include contract flaws, validator underperformance or penalties, and a market price for the LST that falls below the value of its staked assets. A liquid token also does not guarantee that you can exit immediately at a particular price.

No audit is listed for these validator LSTs, and the project does not publish a fee schedule for them. Those gaps make it harder to assess the risk and net return before depositing. Check the exact pool’s documentation, validator details, redemption route and any audit information before committing funds. Only stake an amount you can afford to have exposed to smart-contract, validator and market risks.

How do you start staking through Sanctum?

Sanctum presents itself as Solana staking infrastructure and promotes a Sanctum app for liquid staking. To get started, use the official app, connect a Solana wallet and inspect the exact LST and pool before approving a transaction. Confirm that the wallet is on Solana and that the token name and transaction details match your intended pool. Keep enough SOL available for network fees.

The project does not publish a list of supported wallets or specific redemption limits for these validator LSTs in the details provided on its site. Don’t assume every LST has the same exit route or timing. Before staking a larger amount, check the pool’s instructions for unstaking or swapping back, and consider testing the process with a small amount if you are comfortable with the associated costs.

Who should choose another way to stake SOL?

Sanctum’s offering is aimed at people already using Solana who understand that an LST can trade differently from SOL and are prepared to compare pool-level details. It may also interest institutions or Solana projects: Sanctum promotes custom LSTs and white-label validator services for teams. That institutional offering is separate from deciding whether a particular validator LST suits your own wallet.

This is a poor fit if you need a guaranteed yield, clear fees before choosing a pool, or an independently listed audit record. SANC is identified as Sanctum’s token, and the project refers to a CLOUD-to-SANC transition; it also marks community SANC staking as deprecated. The role of SANC in staking through validator LSTs is not specified, so don’t assume you need it or that holding it changes your SOL staking return.

4 steps

How to start with Sanctum Validator LSTs

  1. 1

    Open Sanctum’s official app and connect a Solana wallet you control.

  2. 2

    Choose the specific validator LST and review its pool, validator, yield and redemption instructions.

  3. 3

    Check transaction costs, any pool commission, and whether the displayed APY applies to that token.

  4. 4

    Start with an amount you can afford to expose to smart-contract, validator and market risks; confirm the token received and keep SOL for network fees.

Sanctum Validator LSTs FAQs

What are Sanctum Validator LSTs?

Sanctum Validator LSTs are Solana liquid staking tokens from stake pools deployed with the SanctumSPL Program. You stake SOL and receive a token representing your staked position; the exact pool and token determine its terms.

What APY do Sanctum Validator LSTs offer?

Sanctum advertises 5.49% APY for SOL liquid staking, but that headline does not establish the return for every validator LST. Yields can vary, so check the specific pool’s current rate and how it is calculated before staking.

What fees do Sanctum Validator LSTs charge?

Fees for these validator LSTs are not published in the project details. Before confirming a transaction, check for any pool commission, swap costs and Solana network fees; these can affect your net return.

Are Sanctum Validator LSTs audited?

No audit is listed for these validator LSTs. Your position also depends on the pool’s smart contracts, validator performance and the ability to trade or redeem its token, so review the exact pool before depositing.

Do I need SANC to stake SOL with Sanctum?

The project lists SANC as its token and refers to a CLOUD-to-SANC transition. It also marks community SANC staking as deprecated; the token’s role in staking through validator LSTs is not specified.

Compare

Sanctum Validator LSTs alternatives

All alternatives
Marinade Liquid Staking logoScore 7.0 out of 10

Marinade offers native and liquid SOL staking, but check variable rewards, fees, and the risks of mSOL or Kamino lending before depositing.

TVL $201M−7.0%Solana
Marinade Finance logoScore 7.0 out of 10

Marinade offers non-custodial SOL staking and mSOL, but check changing yields, fees and strategy risks before depositing.

Solana
Score 6.8 out of 10

wstETH packages Lido staked ETH in a non-rebasing token for DeFi, but it still carries staking, smart-contract and market risks.

Ethereum
Kinetiq kHYPE logoScore 6.7 out of 10

Kinetiq kHYPE offers liquid HYPE staking on Hyperliquid, but check its reward fee and conflicting unstaking claims before depositing.

TVL $811M−12.4%Hyperliquid L1
Hipo logo

Hipo

Staking

Score 6.7 out of 10

Hipo offers liquid GRAM staking on TON with hGRAM, but its variable rewards and redemption and smart-contract risks need checking.

TVL $9.95M−20.0%TON
Liquid Collective logoScore 6.6 out of 10

Liquid Collective offers LsETH and LsSOL liquid staking, but check unpublished fees, KYC requirements and exit terms before minting.

TVL $612M−1.7%Ethereum

Same category

More Staking dApps

Staking rankings
Laine SOL logo

Laine SOL

Staking

Score 6.5 out of 10

Laine SOL offers native and liquid SOL staking with a displayed zero pool fee, but laineSOL adds unaudited pool and liquidity risks.

TVL $1.05M−6.8%Solana

Sol Blaze

Staking

Score 6.5 out of 10

SolBlaze issues bSOL for staked SOL, offering DeFi flexibility and an instant exit option with a variable fee.

Solana
Hubra logo

Hubra

Staking

Score 6.5 out of 10

Hubra offers self-custodial SOL staking, raSOL and USDC yield on Solana, but fee and lending-risk details need checking.

Solana
Jito Liquid Staking logoScore 6.4 out of 10

JitoSOL combines Solana staking and MEV rewards with DeFi usability, but check its fees, redemption terms and liquidity risks first.

TVL $918M−7.2%Solana
mETH Protocol logoScore 6.4 out of 10

mETH offers liquid Ethereum staking, but variable yield, unpublished fees and redemption liquidity deserve a close check.

TVL $522M−2.7%Ethereum
Hubra Staked SOL logoScore 6.4 out of 10

Hubra offers native SOL delegation and liquid staking through raSOL, but check its live exit quote and understand the extra liquid-staking risks.

TVL $11.9M−18.8%Solana

Same chain

More on Solana

Solana rankings
Lido logo

Lido

Staking Pool

Score 7.8 out of 10

Lido turns staked ETH into liquid stETH, but variable rewards, a 10% reward fee and withdrawal and contract risks need checking.

TVL $21.7B−1.1%Ethereum · Solana · Terra +2
Bitvavo logo

Bitvavo

Centralized Exchanges

Score 7.7 out of 10

Bitvavo offers euro funding, 400+ crypto assets and Pro Mode, but check withdrawal terms and the separate risks of staking and leverage.

TVL $311M−13.3%Ethereum · Bitcoin · Solana +9
Place Solana logoScore 7.3 out of 10

Solana is a Layer 1 blockchain for apps and payments; you’ll need a compatible wallet and SOL for fees.

Solana
Sol Incinerator logo

Sol Incinerator

Dapp Tools

Score 7.2 out of 10

Sol Incinerator reclaims rent from empty Solana accounts, with optional Pro tools for burning unwanted assets.

Solana
THORChain DEX logoScore 7.1 out of 10

THORChain enables self-custody swaps across supported chains, but variable fees and protocol risks make quote-checking essential.

TVL $60.5M−3.3%THORChain · Bitcoin · Ethereum +10
Coinsquare logo

Coinsquare

Centralized Exchanges

Score 7.0 out of 10

Coinsquare offers Canadians crypto trading and staking, but check fees, withdrawal rules and custody risks before depositing.

TVL $2.67M−5.7%Cardano · Ethereum · XRP Ledger +6

How we checked

Sources

  1. defillama.com/protocol/sanctum-validator-lsts(opens in a new tab)

Last updated . Spotted an error? Tell us and we will correct it.