RocketSwap Base Review: Should You Use It?
RocketSwap was a Base DEX, but it appears inactive: its app address now shows an unrelated service, and the project was reportedly hacked in 2023. Don’t connect a wallet or send funds unless you can independently verify the DEX is operating safely.
By the SkyBitcoins review team · Updated
Quick take
Avoid using RocketSwap Base for now. It was a Base decentralized exchange with an RCKT token, but the project is classified as inactive, its app address now displays an unrelated service, and a 2023 report said funds were compromised in a hack. Before considering any interaction, independently confirm that an official RocketSwap service exists and that you understand the risks; don’t connect your wallet to the current app page.
Ratings
How RocketSwap Base rates
- Trust
- 1.0/10
- Track record, licensing, audits and how your funds are held.
- Value
- 2.0/10
- Fees, odds, rewards and bonuses: what you get for your money.
- Usability
- 1.0/10
- How easy it is to sign up, deposit, play or trade, and withdraw.
- Transparency
- 2.0/10
- How clearly the team, terms, fees and risks are disclosed.
Ratings run from 0 to 10 and use only facts we could check. Where the information isn't public we show n/a instead of guessing.
At a glance
RocketSwap Base key facts
| Type | Decentralized exchange |
|---|---|
| Chain | Base |
| Token | RCKT |
| Status | Inactive |
| Security | 2023 hack reported; no audits listed |
| Listed since | 2023-07-31 |
| Value locked | $457K−0.8% 7d |
| Updated |
Is it for you?
Who RocketSwap Base suits
Good for
- Researchers looking into the history of Base DEXs
- RCKT holders checking the project’s current status before taking any action
Not for
- Anyone looking for an active Base exchange—the app address does not show RocketSwap
- Traders who need published fees, current service details or clear security assurances
- Users unwilling to take the risks of a project linked to a reported hack
Can you still swap tokens on RocketSwap?
RocketSwap was described as a community-initiated decentralized exchange on Base. A DEX normally lets you swap tokens from a connected wallet rather than create a conventional exchange account, but RocketSwap’s current app address does not display that service. It shows Pawerse, a platform for training, deals, shopping and account management. That mismatch, alongside the project’s inactive status, means you should not treat old descriptions or instructions as evidence that swaps still work.
RCKT is associated with the project, and older materials refer to token economics. That does not establish that the token is currently tradable, that staking still works, or that any old contract is safe to use. If you are researching RocketSwap, treat it as a historical Base DEX rather than a live place to trade. Do not connect a wallet or approve a token transaction just because an old page or post points you to it.
What would a RocketSwap trade cost you?
RocketSwap’s trading fees are not published in the project details here, and there is no current RocketSwap trading interface from which to verify a fee schedule. For a functioning DEX, the total cost would typically include the exchange’s swap fee and Base network gas; the effective trade price can also be affected by slippage and liquidity. Those general DEX costs do not tell you what RocketSwap charged or whether it currently processes swaps.
Do not rely on old fee figures, token prices or trading instructions. They may be stale, and a page showing a similar name or token does not prove that it is connected to the original project. Because the app address now displays an unrelated service, the practical cost of trying to use it could include risks beyond fees, such as signing an unintended transaction. Avoid interacting until you can verify the service and its contracts independently.
Can you trust RocketSwap with your funds?
There is a significant reason for caution: a 2023 news report said RocketSwap Labs was hit by a brute-force hack and that funds were compromised. The amount affected and any recovery outcome are not established here. No audits are listed for the project, so there is no listed independent audit to offset that concern. RocketSwap’s inactive status and the unrelated content now displayed at its app address add further uncertainty.
A decentralized exchange generally relies on smart contracts, so a wallet connection or token approval can put your assets at risk if the contracts or interface are unsafe. Do not assume that an old contract is safe because it once operated, or that a new page using the RocketSwap name is official. There is no current basis here to verify custody arrangements, contract security, a licence, or a continuing team response. The safer choice is not to deposit, approve tokens, or connect a wallet to a purported RocketSwap interface.
How can you check RocketSwap without putting funds at risk?
There is no safe, confirmed route to start trading on RocketSwap right now. The app address associated with the project currently displays Pawerse rather than a Base DEX, and the project is classified as inactive. That means you should not follow older wallet setup guides as though they were current instructions or assume that a working-looking page is the original exchange.
If you are checking the project for research or to understand an old RCKT position, first verify any contract address against independent, reliable records and do not sign transactions while doing so. Never share a seed phrase or private key; a legitimate wallet connection should not require either. If you hold RCKT, be wary of unsolicited recovery offers or replacement-token claims. There is no published current process for trading, withdrawing, recovering funds or contacting an active RocketSwap service, so avoid sending assets to any address presented as a deposit or recovery destination.
What should make you choose another Base DEX?
RocketSwap’s main shortfall is that its old identity as a Base DEX does not match what users encounter at its app address now. The project is marked inactive, fees are not published, and no audits are listed. A 2023 report of compromised funds is an additional material risk, while current trading, support and recovery arrangements are not established.
That leaves little reason for someone seeking a working exchange to choose RocketSwap over an active DEX with a verifiable interface, current documentation and clearly stated fees. RCKT holders should also be cautious: old token details do not establish current liquidity or a safe way to sell. If you need to act on a token position, verify the contract and market independently rather than relying on a link, message or interface claiming to represent RocketSwap. For most users, the prudent decision is to avoid interacting until the project’s operation and security can be confirmed.
3 steps
How to start with RocketSwap Base
- 1
Do not connect a wallet to the app address currently associated with RocketSwap; it displays Pawerse, not the DEX.
- 2
If researching RCKT, verify the token contract and any claimed trading venue independently before taking action.
- 3
Do not sign approvals, send funds, or pay anyone claiming they can recover RocketSwap assets unless you can independently verify the process.
RocketSwap Base FAQs
What was RocketSwap Base?
RocketSwap was described as a decentralized exchange on Base, with the RCKT token. The app address currently displays Pawerse, an unrelated service, so you should not assume RocketSwap is still available there.
Is RocketSwap Base still active?
It appears inactive. The app address displays an unrelated service, and RocketSwap is classified as inactive. There is no clear sign that its DEX is currently operating.
Was RocketSwap hacked?
A 2023 news report said RocketSwap Labs suffered a brute-force hack that compromised funds. The amount and any recovery details are not established here, and no audits are listed.
What fees did RocketSwap charge?
RocketSwap’s trading fees are not published. Since the app does not appear to be operating as RocketSwap, don’t connect a wallet or trade based on old fee or token information.
Compare
RocketSwap Base alternatives
Uniswap offers wallet-based swaps and liquidity pools across 15+ networks, but pool fees, gas and self-custody risks still matter.
Uniswap V2 enables wallet-based swaps and liquidity provision, but check the pool, network, gas and token risks before you trade.
Uniswap V3 offers wallet-based token swaps and concentrated liquidity, but check pool fees, gas, execution risks and price-range exposure.
Uniswap v4 offers multichain swaps and customizable pools, but check each pool’s fees, hook behavior and risks before trading.
THORChain enables self-custody swaps across supported chains, but variable fees and protocol risks make quote-checking essential.
XRPL DEX offers native order-book and AMM trading, but you need a separate wallet and interface and must check each asset and pool.
Same category
More DEXes
Stellar DEX offers native trading and path payments, but costs, liquidity and asset controls depend on the market, issuer and wallet you choose.
Osmosis offers wallet-based swaps and liquidity pools for Cosmos assets, but check route costs, liquidity and protocol risks before trading.
Aerodrome combines Base token swaps, liquidity pools and AERO voting, but pool fees and smart-contract risks deserve a close check.
SaucerSwap offers Hedera swaps, limit orders and liquidity, but check transaction costs and pool risks before connecting your wallet.
THORChain offers self-custody swaps across supported chains, but variable gas and liquidity fees and protocol risks deserve a careful check.
SaucerSwap V2 offers self-custody swaps and concentrated-liquidity pools on Hedera, but check fees, price ranges and contract risks first.
Same chain
More on Base
Bitvavo offers euro funding, 400+ crypto assets and Pro Mode, but check withdrawal terms and the separate risks of staking and leverage.
Aave V3 offers non-custodial lending and collateralised borrowing, but rates vary and deposits remain exposed to DeFi and liquidation risks.
Compound V3 offers variable-rate crypto lending across several networks, but market terms and liquidation risks require close checking.
Aave V4 offers non-custodial lending and collateralized borrowing, but rates vary and smart-contract, market and liquidation risks remain.
DeFi Saver offers non-custodial lending, leverage, swaps and automation, but users still bear protocol, contract and transaction-cost risks.
Euler V2 offers configurable lending markets across many chains, but check each vault’s rates, liquidity and liquidation rules before depositing.
How we checked
Sources
Last updated . Spotted an error? Tell us and we will correct it.