Skip to content

Aztec Connect Review: Should You Still Use It?

Aztec Connect was a privacy-focused Ethereum bridge for accessing DeFi, but it is inactive and was reported deprecated in 2023. Don’t treat it as a live service or send it funds.

By the SkyBitcoins review team · Updated

Quick take

Verdict: don’t use Aztec Connect for new deposits. It was a privacy-focused bridge that connected Ethereum DeFi apps with an Aztec rollup, but it is marked inactive and was reported deprecated in 2023. Its current fees, contract guidance and withdrawal process are not established. Before interacting with any old contract or following archived instructions, verify the exact asset and official guidance; don’t assume the newer Aztec network is the same service.

Ratings

How Aztec Connect rates

Trust
2.0/10
Track record, licensing, audits and how your funds are held.
Value
n/a
Fees, odds, rewards and bonuses: what you get for your money.
Usability
0.5/10
How easy it is to sign up, deposit, play or trade, and withdraw.
Transparency
3.0/10
How clearly the team, terms, fees and risks are disclosed.

Ratings run from 0 to 10 and use only facts we could check. Where the information isn't public we show n/a instead of guessing.

At a glance

Aztec Connect key facts

Aztec Connect key facts
TypePrivacy-focused Ethereum DeFi bridge
NetworkEthereum
StatusInactive; reported deprecated in March 2023
TokenNone listed for Aztec Connect
Audits0 audits listed
Value locked$0
Updated

Is it for you?

Who Aztec Connect suits

Good for

  • People researching the history of privacy tools for Ethereum DeFi
  • Former users checking whether old Aztec Connect instructions are still relevant

Not for

  • Anyone looking for a live bridge or privacy service; Aztec Connect is inactive
  • Users who need clear current withdrawal, fee or contract guidance before sending funds
  • Anyone seeking a currently supported Ethereum DeFi app

What did Aztec Connect let you do?

Aztec Connect was a privacy-focused zk-rollup bridge intended to let people access Ethereum DeFi apps through Aztec. In broad terms, it connected Ethereum applications with a separate rollup environment designed to give users more privacy than a direct, public onchain interaction. That made it a bridge-like product, not a general-purpose exchange or a token project.\n\nThe important point for a prospective user is that this is historical functionality, not a live service to try. Aztec Connect is classified as inactive, and a crypto news report says Aztec Labs deprecated it in March 2023. Aztec’s current site describes a newer Ethereum layer 2 for private apps; don’t assume that network is a continuation of the old bridge with the same contracts or user flows. If you are researching the product, focus on its past role rather than expecting to deposit, trade or bridge through it today.

Can you still estimate Aztec Connect’s costs?

There is no reliable current price to quote for using Aztec Connect. Its fees are not published here, and historical costs could have depended on the transaction, Ethereum gas conditions and the particular DeFi action. Because the service is inactive, even an old fee description would not establish what a user would pay now.\n\nDo not treat the absence of a published fee as evidence that a transaction is free. Interacting with Ethereum contracts can involve network gas, and a bridge or DeFi action can have additional costs. But there is no basis to give a current Aztec Connect fee estimate or compare its former cost with alternatives. If you encounter a fee schedule in archived material, check its date and whether it applies to the exact contract and action you are considering. Avoid sending a test deposit: the service’s inactive status makes that an unsafe way to find out whether it still works.

Can you trust Aztec Connect with funds now?

Aztec Connect should not be treated as a currently supported place to hold or route funds. It is marked inactive, and its reported deprecation makes live functionality and ongoing support doubtful. The project is listed with zero audits, but that figure alone does not prove that no security review ever took place. It also does not establish the safety of any old contract or current withdrawal path.\n\nThere is no current licence, custody arrangement, incident record or fund-recovery process established for Aztec Connect here. Don’t infer these details from the newer Aztec network’s claims about its architecture: those describe a different, newer product. If you have funds or an old transaction associated with Connect, identify the exact contract and asset before doing anything. Seek current, product-specific official guidance, and never share a seed phrase or sign a transaction merely because an old guide tells you to.

How should you approach old Aztec Connect instructions?

There is no safe new-user flow to recommend for an inactive service. The historical product linked Ethereum DeFi apps with an Aztec rollup, but current wallet support, supported contracts, transaction speed and withdrawal instructions are not established. Old documentation or app interfaces may no longer reflect a working route.\n\nThe newer Aztec network described on Aztec’s current site is not proof that Aztec Connect remains operational. Confirm that any app, contract address and instructions explicitly apply to Aztec Connect and are current before considering an interaction. If you cannot confirm those points through official, product-specific guidance, stop rather than connecting a wallet or approving a transaction. A wallet connection alone does not move funds, but signing an approval or transaction can have consequences; read every prompt and verify the destination independently.

Why should you choose something else?

The main drawback is decisive: Aztec Connect is inactive, so it is not a practical choice for someone seeking a bridge today. There is no current fee schedule, supported-app list, wallet guide or clear withdrawal process established here. That leaves prospective users unable to make the basic checks they need before moving assets.\n\nThe name can also cause confusion. Aztec’s current site presents a newer privacy-focused Ethereum network and apps, while Aztec Connect was an earlier bridge product. Similar branding does not mean they share contracts, features or fund access. If you need a working privacy tool or Ethereum bridge, choose a service that clearly publishes its current status, contracts, fees, security reviews and withdrawal steps. Aztec Connect may still interest researchers or former users, but its inactive status makes it unsuitable for new deposits or routine DeFi use.

4 steps

How to start with Aztec Connect

  1. 1

    Do not deposit to Aztec Connect or approve a new transaction just to test whether it works.

  2. 2

    If you have an old position or transaction, identify the exact asset and contract address from your own records before taking action.

  3. 3

    Look for current, product-specific official guidance about that exact contract and any withdrawal process; do not rely on old tutorials alone.

  4. 4

    If you cannot verify the guidance, do not sign or send funds. Never share your seed phrase with anyone offering to recover them.

Aztec Connect FAQs

What was Aztec Connect?

Aztec Connect was a privacy-focused zk-rollup bridge that let users access Ethereum DeFi apps through an Aztec rollup. It is distinct from the newer Aztec private-app network described on Aztec’s current site.

Is Aztec Connect still active?

No. Aztec Connect is classified as inactive, and a crypto news report says Aztec Labs deprecated it in March 2023. Don’t assume its bridge or apps are available now.

What were Aztec Connect’s fees?

Fees for Aztec Connect are not published here, so you can’t reliably estimate what using it would have cost. In any event, its inactive status means you should not initiate a deposit to try it.

Was Aztec Connect audited, and is it safe to use?

The project is listed with zero audits, which does not establish whether an audit was conducted elsewhere. With the service inactive and its current contract and withdrawal guidance unclear, don’t send funds or rely on old instructions.

Is Aztec Connect the same as the current Aztec network?

Aztec’s current site describes a newer Ethereum layer 2 for private apps, not a live Aztec Connect bridge. Treat them as separate products when checking whether a service or contract is current.

Compare

Aztec Connect alternatives

All alternatives
Violet Garden logo

Violet Garden

Cross Chain Bridge

Score 7.0 out of 10

Garden swaps Bitcoin and other crypto across listed chains without wrapped BTC, but check the live quote and refund conditions first.

Bitcoin · Ethereum · Solana +9
Across logo

Across

Cross Chain Bridge

Score 6.7 out of 10

Across bridges and swaps tokens across supported chains; check the quoted output, fees, and route details before signing.

TVL $15.4M−6.0%Ethereum · Arbitrum · Optimism +19
Axelar Cross Chain logo

Axelar Cross Chain

Cross Chain Bridge

Score 6.4 out of 10

Axelar offers cross-chain transfers and developer tools, but check the route, fees and audit details before moving assets.

TVL $5.08M−0.2%BNB Chain · Arbitrum · Ethereum
Symbiosis logo

Symbiosis

Cross Chain Bridge

Score 6.2 out of 10

Symbiosis routes cross-chain swaps across 50+ networks, but check the live quote and route-specific risks before approving.

TVL $8.09M−10.8%Ethereum · TON · Tron +53
Maya Protocol logo

Maya Protocol

Cross Chain Bridge

Score 6.2 out of 10

Maya Protocol offers non-custodial swaps between native assets, but check route costs and protocol risks before sending funds.

TVL $5.85M−0.4%Zcash · Bitcoin · Ethereum +4
Relay logo

Relay

Cross Chain Bridge

Score 6.2 out of 10

Relay offers cross-chain swaps and developer tools, but check the route’s fee, supported chains and security details before signing.

Same category

More Cross Chain Bridges

Cross Chain Bridge rankings

Layerzero

Cross Chain Bridge

Score 6.2 out of 10

LayerZero powers cross-chain apps, but costs and security vary by app and route, so check both before sending assets.

Ethereum
Wormhole logo

Wormhole

Cross Chain Bridge

Score 6.1 out of 10

Wormhole connects supported blockchains, but route-dependent costs and bridge risks make careful checks essential.

Ethereum · Solana · Cosmos +5
Axelar Network logo

Axelar Network

Cross Chain Bridge

Score 6.0 out of 10

Axelar connects chains for asset transfers and apps; verify your route, costs and security details before sending funds.

Stargate V2 logo

Stargate V2

Cross Chain Bridge

Score 5.8 out of 10

Stargate V2 offers broad cross-chain transfers, but check route availability, fees and destination details before sending funds.

TVL $79.2M+3.6%Ethereum · BNB Chain · Arbitrum +21
Hyperlane logo

Hyperlane

Cross Chain Bridge

Score 5.8 out of 10

Hyperlane offers cross-chain bridging and messaging across many networks, but check route security and costs before sending funds.

TVL $69.9M−5.0%BNB Chain · Ethereum · Base +23
Stargate V1 logo

Stargate V1

Cross Chain Bridge

Score 5.8 out of 10

Stargate V1 bridges supported assets across chains through LayerZero, but check the exact route, quote and bridge risks before transferring.

TVL $8.59M−0.8%Ethereum · Arbitrum · Mantle +9

Same chain

More on Ethereum

Ethereum rankings
Lido logo

Lido

Staking Pool

Score 7.8 out of 10

Lido turns staked ETH into liquid stETH, but variable rewards, a 10% reward fee and withdrawal and contract risks need checking.

TVL $21.7B−1.1%Ethereum · Solana · Terra +2
Bitvavo logo

Bitvavo

Centralized Exchanges

Score 7.7 out of 10

Bitvavo offers euro funding, 400+ crypto assets and Pro Mode, but check withdrawal terms and the separate risks of staking and leverage.

TVL $311M−13.3%Ethereum · Bitcoin · Solana +9

Aave

Lending

Score 7.7 out of 10

Aave offers open crypto lending and borrowing, but variable rates, gas costs and liquidation risk make it best for informed DeFi users.

Ethereum
Aave V3 logo

Aave V3

Lending

Score 7.6 out of 10

Aave V3 offers non-custodial lending and collateralised borrowing, but rates vary and deposits remain exposed to DeFi and liquidation risks.

TVL $15.8B+3.4%Ethereum · Base · Arbitrum +18
Getblock logo

Getblock

Infrastructure

Score 7.4 out of 10

GetBlock suits teams needing multi-chain RPC and data services, but check usage billing, coverage and SLA terms before relying on it in production.

Bitcoin · XRP Ledger · Ethereum +3
Uniswap logo

Uniswap

DEXes

Score 7.4 out of 10

Uniswap offers wallet-based swaps and liquidity pools across 15+ networks, but pool fees, gas and self-custody risks still matter.

Ethereum · Base · Arbitrum +2

How we checked

Sources

  1. defillama.com/protocol/aztec-connect(opens in a new tab)

Last updated . Spotted an error? Tell us and we will correct it.