SFT Protocol Review: What Can You Safely Assess?
SFT Protocol presents staking and farming products alongside a DePIN and Filecoin focus. The available details are too limited to judge costs, withdrawals or the safety of depositing.
By the SkyBitcoins review team · Updated
At a glance
SFT Protocol key facts
| Category | Staking |
|---|---|
| Chain | Filecoin |
| Token | SFT |
| Products | Staking, farms and pool listed |
| Value locked | $111K−9.5% 7d |
| Updated |
SFT Protocol FAQs
What is SFT Protocol?
SFT Protocol’s site lists staking, farms and a pool, and describes the project as a full-chain value capture platform. Its broader description connects the project with DePIN infrastructure, including storage and computing.
What token and chain does SFT Protocol use?
SFT is the listed token, and Filecoin is the listed chain. The protocol’s current staking mechanics and the relationship between SFT and any staking receipt token are not clear enough to assess.
Is SFT Protocol safe, and what does it cost?
Fees, withdrawal terms and the protocol’s custody model are not established. No audit is listed, so check the current documentation and contract details before depositing.
Compare
SFT Protocol alternatives
Marinade offers native and liquid SOL staking, but check variable rewards, fees, and the risks of mSOL or Kamino lending before depositing.
Marinade offers non-custodial SOL staking and mSOL, but check changing yields, fees and strategy risks before depositing.
wstETH packages Lido staked ETH in a non-rebasing token for DeFi, but it still carries staking, smart-contract and market risks.
Kinetiq kHYPE offers liquid HYPE staking on Hyperliquid, but check its reward fee and conflicting unstaking claims before depositing.
Hipo offers liquid GRAM staking on TON with hGRAM, but its variable rewards and redemption and smart-contract risks need checking.
Liquid Collective offers LsETH and LsSOL liquid staking, but check unpublished fees, KYC requirements and exit terms before minting.
Same category
More Staking dApps
Laine SOL offers native and liquid SOL staking with a displayed zero pool fee, but laineSOL adds unaudited pool and liquidity risks.
SolBlaze issues bSOL for staked SOL, offering DeFi flexibility and an instant exit option with a variable fee.
Hubra offers self-custodial SOL staking, raSOL and USDC yield on Solana, but fee and lending-risk details need checking.
JitoSOL combines Solana staking and MEV rewards with DeFi usability, but check its fees, redemption terms and liquidity risks first.
mETH offers liquid Ethereum staking, but variable yield, unpublished fees and redemption liquidity deserve a close check.
Hubra offers native SOL delegation and liquid staking through raSOL, but check its live exit quote and understand the extra liquid-staking risks.
Same chain
More on Filecoin
Uniswap V3 offers wallet-based token swaps and concentrated liquidity, but check pool fees, gas, execution risks and price-range exposure.
Bitget combines crypto trading tools with other asset products, but check fees, local access and custodial risks before depositing.
SushiSwap offers wallet-based token swaps across 30+ chains, but check each trade’s fees, route and contract risks before approving.
Gate offers extensive crypto trading and earn tools, but check local access, fees, verification rules and reserve evidence before depositing.
SushiSwap V3 offers wallet-based swaps across many chains, but check each quote carefully and account for smart-contract and liquidity risks.
OKX offers extensive crypto trading tools, but check regional access, fees, verification rules and custody protections before depositing.
How we checked
Sources
Last updated . Spotted an error? Tell us and we will correct it.