Skip to content

Infrared Finance Review: Is Its Berachain Staking Worth Using?

Infrared offers Berachain liquid-staking products and Proof of Liquidity vaults. Before depositing, check the fees, redemption terms and contract risks; they are not clearly published.

By the SkyBitcoins review team · Updated

Quick take

Infrared may suit BERA holders who want liquid staking or a simpler route into Berachain Proof of Liquidity vaults. Its main draw is a set of products built around that ecosystem, including iBERA and iBGT. But the fee schedule, redemption details and security assurances are not clear enough to treat deposits as low-risk. Check current vault terms and contract information before connecting a wallet or committing funds.

Ratings

How Infrared Finance rates

Trust
3.0/10
Track record, licensing, audits and how your funds are held.
Value
4.0/10
Fees, odds, rewards and bonuses: what you get for your money.
Usability
5.5/10
How easy it is to sign up, deposit, play or trade, and withdraw.
Transparency
3.5/10
How clearly the team, terms, fees and risks are disclosed.

Ratings run from 0 to 10 and use only facts we could check. Where the information isn't public we show n/a instead of guessing.

At a glance

Infrared Finance key facts

Infrared Finance key facts
TypeBerachain liquid staking and PoL vaults
ChainBerachain
ProductsiBERA, iBGT and PoL vaults
TokenIR
FeesProtocol fees not published
AuditsNone listed
Value locked$12.0M−16.4% 7d
Updated

Is it for you?

Who Infrared Finance suits

Good for

  • BERA holders exploring liquid staking on Berachain
  • Berachain users looking to participate in Proof of Liquidity vaults
  • DeFi users willing to review vault and redemption terms before depositing

Not for

  • Anyone who needs a published fee schedule or clear redemption terms before committing funds
  • Users looking for an established audit record or clearly documented custody protections
  • People who want staking outside the Berachain ecosystem

What can you do with Infrared on Berachain?

Infrared is a Berachain protocol built around Proof of Liquidity (PoL), Berachain’s system for directing liquidity toward network participants. Its PoL vaults are intended to make participation in that system simpler. The homepage also describes iBERA as a liquid-staking product for BERA and lists iBGT, IR and a swap feature.

The practical appeal is that you can explore staking and PoL-related products in one Berachain-focused app, rather than interacting with each component separately. However, product names alone do not tell you how a particular vault allocates assets, what rewards it may generate, or when you can withdraw. The protocol does not publish a guaranteed return, and rewards can change. Read the current documentation for the specific product you intend to use, including the assets it accepts and the conditions for redeeming any receipt token. Treat any displayed yield as variable, not promised.

What will Infrared cost you?

Infrared does not publish a complete protocol fee schedule on its homepage, so you cannot compare its total cost from that page alone. Check the documentation and the deposit interface for any vault, staking or withdrawal charges before approving a transaction. A fee shown in an app can also change; review the transaction details in your wallet before confirming.

You should also budget for Berachain network fees when depositing, interacting with a vault or withdrawing. If a liquid token is involved, its market price may differ from the value of the underlying asset, particularly when liquidity is limited or market conditions are stressed. That price difference is separate from any protocol charge. Infrared lists a swap feature, but its pricing and applicable charges are not explained in the homepage description. Compare the final amount and transaction details before using it, and do not assume that a quoted reward outweighs fees or the risks of the underlying position.

How much should you trust Infrared with funds?

A deposit into a DeFi protocol exposes you to smart-contract risk: a flaw or exploit can put deposited assets at risk. Liquid-staking and vault products can add further risks tied to how assets are staked, managed and redeemed. Infrared’s product overview does not establish its custody model or explain the controls that would limit those risks.

No audits are listed for Infrared in the protocol directory used for this review. Infrared does have a Security section and publishes terms and a privacy policy, but those labels alone do not establish an audit, insurance coverage or regulatory approval. The project’s licensing status is not published in the information reviewed here; that does not prove it is unlicensed, but you should not assume regulatory protection. Before depositing, look for current independent audit reports, contract addresses and documentation on upgrade or admin controls. Only risk funds you can afford to lose, and consider making a small test transaction first.

What should you check before using Infrared?

Infrared is built for Berachain, so you need a wallet that supports the network and the assets required by the product you choose. The homepage presents a Deposit flow and lists PoL vaults, iBERA, iBGT, IR and Swap. It does not specify a complete list of supported wallets or describe mobile-app support, so confirm that your wallet can connect to Berachain before you begin.

Start by checking that you are using the official Infrared app and the correct network. Read the documentation for the specific vault or staking product, including what token you receive, whether rewards accrue automatically, and how redemption works. Connect your wallet only after confirming the app and contract details, then review each approval and transaction in your wallet. Begin with a small amount if you decide to proceed. Keep enough of the network’s gas token for future transactions, and save the relevant transaction records so you can track deposits and withdrawals.

Where does Infrared fall short?

Infrared’s main limitation for a cautious depositor is the gap between its product overview and the details you need to assess a deposit. The homepage explains the broad purpose of PoL vaults and iBERA, but does not provide a full fee schedule, clear redemption conditions, a described custody model or audit reports. Those details matter because a liquid-staking token is not the same as cash: its market value, liquidity and redemption path can differ from the underlying asset.

The app is also specific to Berachain, which limits its usefulness if you want to manage assets across several networks. The homepage’s list of products is not enough to determine which vault is right for you or what returns it may produce. Check current product documentation and contract information before depositing, and avoid relying on a token name or advertised yield as proof of safety. If you need extensive public security documentation or clearly stated costs before taking risk, choose a service that publishes those details.

5 steps

How to start with Infrared Finance

  1. 1

    Check that using Berachain DeFi is appropriate for you and confirm you are on Infrared’s official app.

  2. 2

    Connect a wallet that supports Berachain, but do not approve a transaction until you have checked the network and contract details.

  3. 3

    Read the current documentation for the specific iBERA or PoL vault product, including its fees, asset requirements and redemption conditions.

  4. 4

    Review the transaction and token approvals in your wallet; consider starting with a small amount.

  5. 5

    Keep funds available for network fees and track how to redeem your position before depositing more.

Infrared Finance FAQs

What is Infrared Finance?

Infrared is a Berachain protocol with Proof of Liquidity vaults and liquid products, including iBERA. It is designed to make participation in Berachain’s Proof of Liquidity system easier.

What is iBERA?

iBERA is Infrared’s liquid-staking product for BERA. Check its current documentation for how staking, rewards and redemption work before depositing.

What fees does Infrared charge?

Infrared’s homepage does not publish a complete fee schedule. You should also account for Berachain transaction fees, and check the vault’s terms before depositing.

Is Infrared Finance safe?

No audits are listed in the protocol’s available directory entry, and Infrared’s custody and contract controls are not established by the product description. Treat deposits as exposed to smart-contract and staking risks.

What is the IR token used for?

IR is listed as Infrared’s token, but its specific utility is not explained on the homepage. Don’t assume that holding IR entitles you to fees, governance rights or staking rewards without checking current token documentation.

Compare

Infrared Finance alternatives

All alternatives
Mellow Restaking logo

Mellow Restaking

Liquid Restaking

Score 6.5 out of 10

Mellow offers configurable yield vault infrastructure, but depositors should review each vault’s costs, risks and redemption terms.

TVL $21.8M−2.5%Ethereum · BNB Chain · Fraxtal +2
Pico Staked SOL logo

Pico Staked SOL

Liquid Restaking

Score 6.2 out of 10

Pico Staked SOL offers native Solana staking and Sanctum-issued picoSOL, but check the validator commission and LST risks before depositing.

TVL $1.63M−7.2%Solana
HERE Wallet staking logo

HERE Wallet staking

Liquid Restaking

Score 6.2 out of 10

HERE Wallet offers self-custodial NEAR staking with advertised instant, no-fee withdrawals, but check the yield and contract details first.

TVL $857K−17.5%Near

Etherfi

Liquid Restaking

Score 6.2 out of 10

Ether.fi offers Ethereum liquid staking and restaking, but weigh contract, slashing and liquidity risks against the value of a tokenized ETH position.

Ethereum
Mantle Restaking logo

Mantle Restaking

Liquid Restaking

Score 5.8 out of 10

Mantle Restaking offers ETH staking and restaking tokens, but check its variable yield, redemption terms and contract risks first.

TVL $36.0M−1.3%Ethereum
Jito Restaking logo

Jito Restaking

Liquid Restaking

Score 5.8 out of 10

Jito Restaking offers Solana vaults for NCN security, but check each vault’s fees, exit rules and risks before depositing.

TVL $14.6M−9.8%Solana

Same category

More Liquid Restaking dApps

Liquid Restaking rankings
Swell Liquid Restaking logo

Swell Liquid Restaking

Liquid Restaking

Score 5.5 out of 10

Swell offers Ethereum users rswETH for liquid restaking, but check fees, redemption terms and audit coverage before depositing.

TVL $25.2M−3.6%Ethereum
Puffer Stake logo

Puffer Stake

Liquid Restaking

Score 5.5 out of 10

Puffer Stake offers Ethereum holders pufETH and restaking exposure, but check fees, audits, liquidity and the UniFi Vault notice before depositing.

TVL $22.0M−2.8%Ethereum
sTLOS Liquid Staking logo

sTLOS Liquid Staking

Liquid Restaking

Score 5.5 out of 10

sTLOS gives Telos EVM stakers a receipt token, but verify fees, audits and redemption terms before depositing.

TVL $257K−8.6%Telos
Bedrock uniETH logo

Bedrock uniETH

Liquid Restaking

Score 5.4 out of 10

Bedrock uniETH offers liquid exposure to staked ETH and restaking rewards, but confirm its fees and exit terms before depositing.

TVL $22.9M−1.5%Ethereum
Coinbase Wrapped Staked ETH logoScore 5.3 out of 10

cbETH makes Coinbase-staked ETH transferable, but check fees, redemption terms and price risk before using it.

TVL $443M−1.0%Ethereum
EigenCloud logo

EigenCloud

Liquid Restaking

Score 5.2 out of 10

EigenCloud offers open-model inference, verifiable agents and collaborative research, but product costs and key trust details need checking.

TVL $5.70B−2.2%Ethereum

Same chain

More on Berachain

Berachain rankings
Euler V2 logo

Euler V2

Lending

Score 7.1 out of 10

Euler V2 offers configurable lending markets across many chains, but check each vault’s rates, liquidity and liquidation rules before depositing.

TVL $267M−0.9%Monad · Ethereum · Base +13
Sablier Lockup logoScore 7.0 out of 10

Sablier Lockup offers flexible on-chain token vesting, but check its fees, supported network and contract risks before funding a stream.

TVL $1.75M−4.0%Ethereum · Polygon · Arbitrum +25
Dolomite logo

Dolomite

Lending

Score 6.5 out of 10

Dolomite offers multi-network lending, borrowing, swaps and strategies, but variable rates, liquidation and contract risks call for care.

TVL $142M−19.6%Ethereum · Arbitrum · Berachain +4
vfat.io logo

vfat.io

Yield Aggregator

Score 6.5 out of 10

vfat.io combines multi-chain yield discovery and portfolio tools with non-custodial position automation, but check costs and contract risks first.

TVL $31.3M−2.9%Base · Ethereum · Hyperliquid L1 +33
Chronicle logo

Chronicle

Infrastructure

Score 6.4 out of 10

Chronicle supplies oracle feeds and tokenized-asset verification for onchain markets, but pricing and service terms are not published.

TVL $0Aurora · Ethereum · Arbitrum +8
LayerZero V2 logoScore 6.3 out of 10

LayerZero V2 powers cross-chain features in other apps; compare the exact route, fee and security settings before sending funds.

TVL $17.5B+3.4%Polygon · Ethereum · ApeChain +76

How we checked

Sources

  1. defillama.com/protocol/infrared-finance(opens in a new tab)

Last updated . Spotted an error? Tell us and we will correct it.