Skip to content

Comparison · Updated

ICHI or Snuggle: Which Liquidity Manager Fits You in 2026?

Choose Snuggle if you want automated liquidity management on Base or Arbitrum and accept its 15% earnings fee. ICHI offers single-token Uniswap V3 vaults, but its app currently shows no available vaults or networks, so verify availability before considering a deposit.

ICHI logo

ICHI

Liquidity Manager

Score 5.2 out of 10

TVL $5.56M · 26 chains

Snuggle logo

Snuggle

Liquidity Manager

Score 6.1 out of 10

TVL $11.6M · 3 chains

Side by side

ICHI vs Snuggle at a glance

ICHI and Snuggle compared
 ICHISnuggle
CategoryLiquidity manager; non-custodial protocolAutomated concentrated-liquidity manager
TVLAbout $5.6 million; undated figureAbout $11.6 million; undated figure
ChainsHedera and many EVM chains listed; app currently shows zero vaults and networksBase and Arbitrum advertised; Robinhood Chain listing is unclear
TokenICHI token listed; its role in vaults is not specifiedNo token listed
FeesNo general fee schedule published; vault and network costs may apply15% of earnings, according to Snuggle; network gas may apply
Security and auditsTwo audits listed; check reports, scope and current contract versionsTwo audits listed; check reports, scope and current contract versions
Ease of useOne-token vault deposits, but a live vault must be confirmedAutomated position management; pool, chain and tokens need checking
Standout featureSingle-token deposits into Uniswap V3 liquidity vaultsNo-swap rebalancing and automatic fee reinvestment when enabled
Best forToken holders and projects seeking to manage on-chain liquidity, if a suitable vault is liveLPs who want automated range management on Base or Arbitrum
Main trade-offConcentrated-liquidity and smart-contract risks; fees and returns varyConcentrated-liquidity and smart-contract risks; fees and returns vary

What could ICHI and Snuggle cost you?

Snuggle has the clearer published fee: it says it takes 15% of earnings, leaving 85% to you. That share is not the whole cost of using a liquidity pool. You may also pay network gas for deposits, withdrawals or other transactions, and trading fees depend on pool activity. Snuggle advertises zero swap fees through its no-swap rebalancing approach, but that does not mean every on-chain action is free.

ICHI does not publish a general schedule for deposit, withdrawal, management or performance fees. Its vaults aim to earn trading fees from Uniswap V3 pools, but those fees are variable income, not a predictable return. You may also pay network gas. Before depositing with either service, inspect the specific pool or vault terms and understand how the manager calculates any charge. If you need a published fee structure to compare costs, Snuggle is easier to assess, though you should still confirm the details for the pool you choose.

Which is safer for your funds?

Neither is a low-risk place to park tokens. Both put assets into concentrated-liquidity strategies, where price changes can alter your exposure and leave you holding mostly one asset. Trading fees may not make up for that change in value, and you can end up worse off than if you had simply held your tokens. Smart-contract vulnerabilities and problems in an underlying DEX can also cause losses.

Both list two audits, but the count alone does not show what was checked, what findings remain or whether the deployed contracts are the audited versions. ICHI also names security firms, while Snuggle says it was audited by Valves Security and independent researchers; check the actual reports and covered contracts rather than relying on names or audit claims.

Snuggle says there are no lockups and you can withdraw anytime, but that does not guarantee the value or exact assets you will receive. ICHI’s current app display shows zero vaults and networks, so do not deposit unless you can verify a live vault and its withdrawal terms. Neither is suitable if you need guaranteed principal.

Which is easier to start with?

Snuggle may be easier to start with if you already use Base or Arbitrum and understand liquidity pools. It advertises a wallet-connected flow: select a pool, deposit supported assets, and let its system manage the position. It also says there is no minimum deposit, but small amounts can be disproportionately affected by gas and the earnings fee. Confirm the exact token contracts, pool, DEX and withdrawal path before approving transactions. A token representing Bitcoin is not native Bitcoin on the Bitcoin network.

ICHI’s single-token deposit design may be appealing if you do not want to supply a pair of assets yourself. But its broad chain list does not mean vaults are live everywhere: the app currently shows zero available vaults and networks. You need to find an active vault for your token and chain before you can use it. In either case, use a compatible wallet, check the network and contract address, and keep native tokens available for gas. Snuggle has the clearer advertised route, but neither should be treated as a simple savings product.

What does each liquidity manager do better?

ICHI’s distinguishing feature is the single-token vault: you deposit one asset, and the vault deploys it to a Uniswap V3 concentrated-liquidity pool. That can suit token holders, DAOs or projects seeking to support on-chain liquidity without manually supplying a pair. It does not turn the deposit into fixed-yield savings, and whether you can use it depends on finding a live vault with acceptable terms. ICHI identifies an ICHI token, but do not assume it is required for deposits or gives you a claim on vault income.

Snuggle’s appeal is hands-off management. It advertises automated range repositioning without swaps and fee reinvestment when auto-compound is enabled, across named DEXes including Uniswap V3, Aerodrome and Camelot V3. The approach may reduce some manual work, but it cannot remove pool, market or contract risk. It also takes 15% of earnings. Choose based on the strategy you actually want: ICHI for a suitable live single-token vault, or Snuggle for automated LP management on a supported network.

Verdict: ICHI or Snuggle?

Pick ICHI if you want to put a single token into a Uniswap V3 liquidity vault, especially for token or treasury liquidity management. First confirm that a vault is live for your asset and chain: the app currently shows zero vaults and networks, and ICHI does not publish a general fee schedule. Pick Snuggle if you want automated concentrated-liquidity management on Base or Arbitrum and accept a 15% share of earnings. Its automation and no-swap approach do not guarantee returns or prevent losses. With either service, check the live pool, contract, audit scope, fees and withdrawal terms before depositing.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, ICHI or Snuggle?

Snuggle says it takes 15% of earnings, while ICHI does not publish a general fee schedule. Both can also involve network gas costs, and neither guarantees trading-fee income.

Which protocol is safer?

Both list two audits, but an audit is not a guarantee against exploits or losses. Check the reports’ scope and whether they cover the contracts currently used before depositing.

How do their liquidity strategies differ?

ICHI lets you deposit one token into a vault that deploys funds to Uniswap V3. Snuggle manages concentrated-liquidity positions across several named DEXes and advertises automated rebalancing and fee reinvestment.

Does either protocol guarantee returns?

No. Concentrated-liquidity positions can lose value as prices move, and trading fees may not offset those losses. Snuggle’s automated management and ICHI’s single-token deposit option do not guarantee returns or protect your principal.