Comparison · Updated
Concrete vs Lagoon: Which Vault Platform Fits You in 2026?
Choose Concrete for managed vault strategies across five listed networks; choose Lagoon to compare a wider range of curator-run vaults. Either way, evaluate the individual vault’s strategy, fees, audit scope and withdrawal terms before depositing.
Concrete
Onchain Capital Allocator
TVL $1.21B · 5 chains
Lagoon
Onchain Capital Allocator
TVL $157M · 22 chains
Side by side
Concrete vs Lagoon at a glance
| Concrete | Lagoon | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | On-chain capital allocator with managed DeFi yield vaults | On-chain vault infrastructure; curators run individual strategies |
| Chains | Ethereum, Stable, Arbitrum, Berachain, Katana | 22 listed networks, including Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base and Optimism |
| TVL | About $1.21B; snapshot date not published | About $157M; snapshot date not published |
| Token | CT | No token listed |
| Fees | No general fee schedule published; check the vault’s terms | No platform-wide fee schedule; fees depend on the vault |
| Security and audits | Two audits listed; auditors are identified by vault | Two audits listed for infrastructure; scope varies |
| Ease of use | Compare vault assets, strategies, permissions and redemption terms | Browse vaults, but assess each curator and asynchronous settlement |
| Standout feature | Managed strategies across five listed networks | Infrastructure for varied curator-run strategies across many networks |
| Best for | Users seeking managed DeFi strategies and comfortable checking vault-specific risks | Users who want to compare curator-run vaults or build vault products |
| Access and withdrawals | Some vaults are permissioned; queues or controlled wind-downs may apply | Vaults can be open or gated; deposits and withdrawals settle asynchronously |
What could Concrete or Lagoon cost you?
Neither platform publishes one general fee schedule covering every vault. With Concrete, check the selected vault for management, performance, entry or exit charges. With Lagoon, the curator sets vault-specific fees, so check how they are calculated and whether displayed returns are net of those costs. For either platform, you may also pay network gas when depositing or withdrawing.
A displayed APY or APR is not a promise of what you will earn. Rates can change with strategy performance, and token-price movements, fees and gas can reduce your result. Compare the actual terms for the vault you plan to use rather than treating either platform’s headline yield as your expected return.
Which platform is safer for your funds?
There is no clear winner on safety based on audit counts alone: both list two audits. Concrete identifies auditors on individual vault pages, while Lagoon lists audits for its infrastructure. In either case, an audit is not a guarantee against bugs, exploits, strategy losses or operational mistakes. Check that the report covers the exact contracts and versions used by your chosen vault.
The vault’s strategy and controls matter too. Concrete deploys deposits through managed strategies; Lagoon vaults are run by curators, whose decisions and operational processes affect your funds. Lagoon vaults may involve other protocols or off-chain activity. Review who can move funds or change parameters, how assets are valued, and what could prevent redemption. Only deposit money you can afford to lose.
Which is easier to start with?
Concrete may feel more direct if you want to choose among managed strategies: its vault pages can show assets, networks, yields, auditors and permissions. But you still need to compare the strategy and confirm its access and redemption rules. Some Concrete vaults are permissioned, and some may use queues or controlled wind-downs.
Lagoon offers a broader menu, but it is infrastructure rather than one product with a single strategy. You must assess each curator, underlying assets and vault terms. Its ERC-7540 design means deposits and withdrawals are processed asynchronously, so a request may wait for settlement rather than completing immediately. Neither choice is a simple, guaranteed savings account. If you are new to DeFi, pause until you understand the vault’s risks and how you can get your funds back.
What does each platform do better?
Concrete’s main appeal is managed DeFi yield across five listed networks: Ethereum, Stable, Arbitrum, Berachain and Katana. It may fit you if you want a curated strategy rather than selecting and rebalancing every position yourself. Some vaults issue a vault-specific token for deposits, and vault pages can provide strategy details. Availability and terms still vary by vault.
Lagoon’s distinction is breadth and flexibility. It supports vaults across 22 listed networks and accommodates different curator strategies, including crypto and other forms of exposure. It also provides tools for curators and developers, such as vault deployment tools and a GraphQL API. That flexibility can help experienced users compare approaches, but it also means Lagoon itself does not determine every vault’s strategy or risk. Choose by the specific vault, not by network count alone.
How quickly can you get your funds back?
Treat withdrawal timing as a vault-level decision. Concrete vaults may have a queue, or a completed campaign may move into withdraw-only mode; Concrete does not publish a general timetable or limit. Lagoon uses asynchronous deposits and withdrawals, but it does not provide one universal settlement time or withdrawal limit across vaults. Liquidity and strategy conditions can affect when a request is completed.
Before depositing, find the vault’s withdrawal instructions and check whether you must submit a request, wait for settlement, or meet other conditions. Confirm the supported network and asset too: transactions and gas are network-specific, and sending funds on the wrong chain can cause problems. If you need predictable, instant access to your funds, neither platform is a dependable fit unless the particular vault clearly meets that need.
Verdict: Concrete or Lagoon?
Pick Concrete if you want managed DeFi yield strategies across its five listed networks and are willing to assess each vault’s permissions, risks and redemption terms. Pick Lagoon if you want a wider choice of curator-run vaults or need infrastructure for launching them, and you can evaluate different strategies and asynchronous settlement. Neither is a guaranteed-yield product, and neither publishes a single fee schedule for all vaults. Before committing funds, check the individual vault’s fees, audit scope, access rules and withdrawal process.
Frequently asked questions
Does Concrete or Lagoon guarantee yield?
No. Concrete describes managed strategies, while Lagoon provides infrastructure for vaults run by different curators. Neither platform guarantees a return, and each vault can have distinct risks and withdrawal conditions.
Can you withdraw instantly from either platform?
Not as a general rule. Lagoon uses asynchronous deposit and withdrawal processing, and Concrete vaults may have queues or controlled wind-downs. Check the specific vault’s settlement terms before depositing.
Are Concrete and Lagoon audited?
Both list two audits, but that does not mean every vault or strategy has been audited. Check the report’s scope and the contracts involved in the specific vault you are considering.
Can anyone deposit into their vaults?
Both say access can vary by vault. Concrete marks some vaults as permissioned, while Lagoon vaults may be open or gated, including with KYC or other eligibility checks. Confirm the individual vault’s rules before connecting a wallet.