Skip to content

Comparison · Updated

UNCX Network V2 vs V3: Which Fits Your Project?

Pick V2 when you need a network on its listed set such as Avalanche or Gnosis; pick V3 if you need Celo, Unichain or Hyperliquid. Their core lock, vesting and reward tools are similar, and neither version is automatically safer.

UNCX Network V2 logo

UNCX Network V2

Token Locker

Score 6.8 out of 10

TVL $135M · 9 chains

UNCX Network V3 logo

UNCX Network V3

Token Locker

Score 6.3 out of 10

TVL $24.9M · 10 chains

Side by side

UNCX Network V2 vs UNCX Network V3 at a glance

UNCX Network V2 and UNCX Network V3 compared
 UNCX Network V2UNCX Network V3
CategoryToken-locking and DeFi project infrastructureToken-locking and DeFi project infrastructure
Listed chainsEthereum, BNB Chain, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Robinhood Chain, Optimism, GnosisEthereum, Base, Robinhood Chain, BNB Chain, Polygon, Arbitrum, Unichain, Hyperliquid, Optimism, Celo
TVLNot comparable: snapshot date not publishedNot comparable: snapshot date not published
TokenUNCXUNCX
FeesService fees vary by product; gas is extraService fees vary by product and configuration; gas is extra
Security and auditsTwo audits listed; check report detailsTwo audits listed; check report details
Ease of useCompatible wallet, supported pool and native gas token requiredCompatible wallet, supported pool and native gas token required
Standout toolsLiquidity locks, vesting, staking and farming; token minter also notedLiquidity locks, vesting, staking and farming
Lock flexibilityLocks cannot be withdrawn before their chosen unlock dateLocks cannot be withdrawn before their chosen unlock date
Best fitTeams needing a listed network such as Avalanche or GnosisTeams needing a listed network such as Celo, Unichain or Hyperliquid

Which UNCX version should your project choose?

Choose based on the network and pool you need, not the version number alone. V2 lists Avalanche and Gnosis, while V3 lists Celo, Unichain and Hyperliquid. Both list Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism and Robinhood Chain.

The core jobs overlap: both provide liquidity locking, vesting schedules and project-funded staking or farming rewards. V2 also notes a token minter for ERC-20 setup. That may matter if you need token creation, but confirm that the specific tool and configuration you want are available.

Neither version is a wallet or exchange for trading. Before choosing, check that your exact network, pool and product are supported in the app. A listed chain does not mean every UNCX tool works there.

What will V2 or V3 cost your project?

Neither version has one fixed price across its tools. UNCX service fees vary by product and configuration, and you pay network gas separately in the chain’s native token. Locking liquidity, creating vesting schedules and funding rewards are different actions, so do not assume one fee covers them all.

For staking or farming, include the project’s reward budget in your cost calculation; the pool does not create rewards automatically. You may also need to approve the assets involved before completing the transaction. Network congestion can change gas costs.

Before you approve anything, review the current service fee and transaction preview for the exact action and network. The TVL figures cannot help settle the cost comparison because their snapshot dates are not published, and TVL is not a quote for your transaction.

Which version is safer for your funds?

There is no basis to call either version safer simply because it is V2 or V3. Both list two audits, but an audit count by itself does not tell you which contracts or deployments were reviewed, what the findings were, or whether issues were fixed. Check the reports and confirm they apply to the exact tool and contract you intend to use.

A liquidity lock restricts withdrawal of the locked position until its selected unlock date. It does not guarantee that a token is safe, that a market will stay liquid, or that every project claim is true. Locked assets cannot be withdrawn early, so choose a date you can live with.

Also inspect token details, contract permissions, vesting terms and recipient addresses. Treat public lock records as evidence of the stated lock terms, not as a substitute for your own project and contract checks.

Which version is easier to start with?

The basic steps are similar in V2 and V3: connect a compatible wallet, select a supported product and network, configure the lock or schedule, review fees and terms, approve any required assets, then confirm the transaction. You also need the network’s native token to pay gas.

The important difference is what each version lists as a network. For V2, Avalanche and Gnosis appear in its chain list; V3 lists Celo, Unichain and Hyperliquid instead. The two versions share several major networks, including Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, Polygon, Arbitrum and Optimism.

Check the exact pool and product before you plan a launch. Support can vary within a network, and selecting the wrong pool, recipient, reward budget or unlock date can create costly or irreversible consequences.

What does each version do better?

Both versions help projects make commitments more visible onchain. A liquidity lock can publish a position and unlock date; vesting can set recipient-specific releases using cliffs, linear releases or stepped schedules. Those records make terms easier to inspect, but they do not guarantee a project's conduct or token value.

Reward pools are also project-funded. Before participating in staking or farming, check the reward token, budget, timeline and pool conditions rather than assuming a return is guaranteed. The tools are designed for project teams and communities, not as a way to make an investment risk-free.

V2’s noted token minter is an extra tool to consider if you need ERC-20 setup. Otherwise, the available facts do not establish a broad functional advantage for one version: your network, pool availability and fee preview are the practical deciders.

Verdict: UNCX Network V2 or UNCX Network V3?

Pick UNCX Network V2 if your project needs a listed network such as Avalanche or Gnosis, or you want to consider its noted ERC-20 token minter. Pick UNCX Network V3 if you need Celo, Unichain or Hyperliquid. Both versions offer liquidity locks, vesting and funded reward pools, and their fees vary by product with gas charged separately. Neither version makes a token safe, and locked liquidity cannot be withdrawn before its chosen unlock date. Check your exact pool, contract terms and current app fees before signing.

Frequently asked questions

Which version has lower fees?

Both versions charge product-dependent service fees, plus separate network gas. V3 also requires you to account for the reward budget itself when creating a staking or farming pool; check the app’s current fee and transaction preview before approving.

Can you unlock liquidity early?

Neither version lets you withdraw locked liquidity before the chosen unlock date. Some supported lockers may allow an extension, but not a shorter lock or early withdrawal.

Is V3 safer than V2?

Both list two audits, but an audit count alone does not show the scope or findings. A lock also does not establish that a token, project or market is safe.

Which networks differ between V2 and V3?

Both list Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism and Robinhood Chain. V2 additionally lists Avalanche and Gnosis; V3 lists Celo, Unichain and Hyperliquid. Check your exact product and pool, because support varies by network.