Skip to content

Comparison · Updated

Project X or Turbos: Which DEX Fits You in 2026?

Choose Project X to explore a Hyperliquid-linked DEX with an advertised 0% trading fee; choose Turbos for concentrated-liquidity trading on Sui. Neither lists an audit, so check the live pool, quote and transaction details before connecting funds.

Project X logo

Project X

DEXes

Score 3.6 out of 10

TVL $35.0M · 1 chains

Turbos logo

Turbos

DEXes

Score 4.5 out of 10

TVL $2.83M · 1 chains

Side by side

Project X vs Turbos at a glance

Project X and Turbos compared
 Project XTurbos
CategoryAMM decentralized exchangeDecentralized exchange
ChainHyperliquid / HyperEVMSui
Liquidity modelAutomated market maker; pool details are limitedConcentrated-liquidity markets
Trading feesAdvertises 0%; other costs are not publishedPool fee schedule and tiers are not clearly published
Network costsGas may apply; check the transaction previewSui network fees apply; typically paid in SUI
TokenNo project token listedTURBOS
Security / auditsNo audit listedNo audits listed
TVLCurrent dated TVL: Not publishedCurrent dated TVL: Not published
Ease of useMay suit experienced Hyperliquid users; setup and wallet guidance are limitedMay suit Sui users; requires a compatible Sui wallet and SUI for network fees
Standout featureAdvertised 0% trading feeConcentrated-liquidity markets on Sui
Best forExperienced users who want to check HyperEVM swaps and quotesSui users who want to swap assets or manage concentrated liquidity

Which DEX fits the chain and trade you want?

Choose based on the network and trading model you actually want. Project X is associated with Hyperliquid and HyperEVM, and is described as an automated market maker. Its interface advertises Swap and Liquidity, but supported assets, pools and wallet connections are not fully detailed. It may be worth investigating if you already use Hyperliquid and are comfortable verifying the network and contract yourself.

Turbos is a Sui DEX focused on concentrated-liquidity markets. That makes it a more direct fit if you want to trade Sui assets or provide liquidity in a chosen price range. You will need a Sui-compatible wallet and SUI for network transactions. In either case, check that the asset and pool you intend to use are available before transferring funds; neither DEX's general description is a guarantee that a particular market is supported.

What could each trade or liquidity position cost you?

Project X advertises a 0% trading fee, but that does not make a swap free. Network gas can still apply, and slippage or price impact can reduce the amount you receive. The project does not publish a full fee schedule, so review the live quote and transaction preview for any charges before signing.

Turbos does not clearly publish its fee schedule or pool fee tiers. Check the fee displayed for the specific pool, the quoted output and the slippage setting. Sui network transaction costs may also apply and are typically paid in SUI. If you provide liquidity on either DEX, do not treat pool fees as guaranteed income: price movements can change the value of your position. Turbos positions also have a concentrated range, and may stop earning fees when the market moves outside it.

Which one gives you stronger evidence about fund safety?

Neither DEX has an audit listed. Project X also does not publish team, licence or custody details; Turbos does not establish a licence, named custody arrangement or published security track record. Those gaps make it harder to assess their risks, but they do not by themselves prove that either project is unsafe.

Do not use TVL as a safety guarantee. It cannot establish that contracts are secure or that you will be able to exit a position under all market conditions. Before connecting a wallet, verify the intended app, chain and token, then read the transaction and permission details your wallet presents. Avoid approvals you do not understand. If independent audit coverage or extensive security documentation is essential to you, neither project meets that requirement based on its listed audit information.

Which is easier to start with on your network?

Turbos may be easier to approach if you already use Sui: its network is clear, and its stated purpose is trading Sui-based assets through concentrated-liquidity markets. You still need to check wallet compatibility, pool fees and transaction details; Turbos does not publish a wallet compatibility list or a clear fee schedule. Keep enough SUI for network transactions.

Project X may feel more familiar if you already use Hyperliquid or its EVM environment, but its setup guidance and supported-wallet details are limited. Confirm the network in your wallet and verify the token contract, quote, slippage and gas before signing. For either DEX, start with a small transaction rather than committing a large amount while you are still checking how the app and pool behave.

What does each DEX do better?

Project X's most distinctive pitch is its advertised 0% trading fee. That can be useful when comparing quotes, provided you account for gas, slippage and the actual amount returned. Its limited published information on fees, liquidity and supported markets means you need to do more checking before trading.

Turbos stands out for concentrated-liquidity markets on Sui, which may appeal if you want to manage liquidity within a selected price range. That approach requires more attention from liquidity providers: positions can move out of range and stop earning fees. Its associated token is TURBOS, while Project X has no project token listed. Neither DEX has an audit listed, and neither should be treated as the clear choice for users who need fully documented fees, security and support. Pick the product whose network and trading model match your needs, then verify the live pool details.

Verdict: Project X or Turbos?

Pick Project X if you already use Hyperliquid or HyperEVM and want to compare a swap against its advertised 0% trading fee. Treat that as a trading-fee claim, not a free transaction, and check gas, slippage, liquidity and the contract yourself. Pick Turbos if you use Sui and want concentrated-liquidity markets for swaps or liquidity provision. Its price-range model takes care to manage, and pool fees are not clearly published. Neither lists an audit, so choose neither on the assumption that its contracts have independent audit coverage.

Frequently asked questions

Are swaps on Project X free?

No. Project X advertises a 0% trading fee, but network gas, slippage and possible other costs still matter. Check the transaction preview and compare the expected output with what you send.

Which DEX has an audit?

No audits are listed for either DEX. That does not prove their contracts are unsafe, but it means you should not treat either as independently audited based on the published audit information.

Which one should I use for Sui?

Turbos is the direct fit if you want to trade Sui-based assets through concentrated-liquidity markets. Check that the specific asset and pool you need are available before transferring funds.

Which DEX is better for providing liquidity?

Both have liquidity-provider risks. On Turbos, a position can stop earning fees if the market moves outside its chosen price range; Project X does not publish enough pool detail to assess its liquidity terms. Understand the pool and possible loss before committing funds.