Skip to content

Comparison · Updated

Mantle Restaking vs Stakee: Which Staking Route Fits You in 2026?

Pick Mantle Restaking if you want ETH staking with mETH and accept DeFi complexity. Pick Stakee if you hold TON and value a Telegram-based interface, but its yield, fees and audit claims need careful verification.

Mantle Restaking logo

Mantle Restaking

Liquid Restaking

Score 5.8 out of 10

TVL $36.0M · 1 chains

Stakee logo

Stakee

Liquid Restaking

Score 4.8 out of 10

TVL $23.0M · 1 chains

Side by side

Mantle Restaking vs Stakee at a glance

Mantle Restaking and Stakee compared
 Mantle RestakingStakee
CategoryEthereum liquid staking and restakingTON staking service; no liquid token identified
ChainEthereumTON
TVLHigher listed TVL; timestamp not publishedLower listed TVL; timestamp not published
TokenmETH for staking; cmETH is associated with restakingNo separate liquid-staking token identified
Advertised yield5% APY displayed; variable, not guaranteedUp to 25% advertised; variable, not guaranteed
FeesFull fee schedule not clearly published; Ethereum gas appliesFees not published
Security and auditsTwo audits listed; reports not identifiedAudit claims conflict; report details unclear
Ease of useEthereum wallet and on-chain transactions; DeFi experience helpsTelegram bot or TON wallet on the web
WithdrawalsSmall withdrawals about 1–5 minutes; larger ones about 24 hours, subject to conditionsClaims withdrawals take minutes; verify the route and conditions
Standout featureUse mETH in some DeFi apps; each integration adds its own risksTelegram-based TON staking; no transferable receipt token identified

Which network and staking token fit what you hold?

Choose based on the asset you already hold: Mantle Restaking is for ETH on Ethereum, while Stakee is for TON. They are not direct substitutes, and moving between them would involve exchanging assets and using another network.

With Mantle, you stake ETH and receive mETH, a liquid receipt token. The protocol associates cmETH with its restaking service. mETH may be usable in other DeFi apps, but each integration has separate terms, liquidity and smart-contract risks. Stakee offers a TON staking route through a Telegram bot or a TON wallet on the web. It does not identify a separate liquid-staking token, so don’t assume you will receive a transferable token to use in other TON apps.

If you want a liquid token for potential DeFi use, Mantle is the clearer fit. If you hold TON and prefer to interact through Telegram, Stakee may be more convenient—but its interface does not make the underlying staking risks disappear.

What could each staking route earn—and cost you?

Mantle displays a 5% APY for mETH. Stakee advertises up to 25% APY and uses 21% in its example calculator. These are variable figures, not promised returns; Stakee does not explain its yield mechanics, and Mantle’s displayed rate can change. Don’t choose solely by comparing the headline percentages.

Neither service publishes a complete fee schedule. That makes it difficult to work out your net return, especially for Stakee, where it is also unclear whether the advertised APY is before or after service or validator fees. With Mantle, Ethereum gas applies to on-chain transactions, and a DeFi app may add its own fees or costs. Stakee’s transactions may also involve network costs, but its service does not publish its fee terms.

Before depositing, check the current rate and transaction details in the relevant app. Consider whether the possible reward is worth the contract, liquidity and withdrawal risks. A calculator projection or displayed APY is not a guaranteed earning estimate.

Which is easier to start using?

Stakee presents a relatively direct route: use its Telegram bot or connect a TON wallet on the web, enter an amount, and confirm the transaction. Its stated minimum is 1 TON. The service says rewards accrue daily with automatic compounding and that you can request an unstake at any time. Check the transaction details and withdrawal conditions before confirming, rather than relying on the advertised convenience alone.

Mantle requires an Ethereum wallet and on-chain transactions. You stake ETH for mETH, and using mETH in other apps means learning those apps’ interfaces and risks too. That can give you more ways to use the receipt token, but it is a more involved path than staking through a Telegram interface. You will also need ETH for Ethereum gas.

For a TON holder seeking a simple interface, Stakee may feel easier to start with. For an ETH holder who already understands wallets and DeFi, Mantle offers a more familiar liquid-staking structure. Neither is a good choice if you are uncomfortable checking contracts, transaction prompts and withdrawal terms.

Which has the clearer security picture for your funds?

Neither option removes the risks of putting crypto into a staking service. Mantle lists two audits, but the reports and their findings are not identified. It also reports zero slashing incidents to date; that history is not a guarantee against future penalties, contract bugs or losses. Restaking and using mETH in third-party DeFi apps can add further exposure beyond ordinary ETH staking.

Stakee’s audit claims are harder to assess: it attributes the audit to different organisations in different places and does not provide clear report details. Its claim that the contract handles funds rather than a third party is not a guarantee that deposits are safe or immediately recoverable. Fees, yield mechanics and withdrawal limits are also not published.

On disclosure, Mantle gives you more concrete information about its token and redemption paths, while Stakee’s audit claims are inconsistent. That does not establish that Mantle is safe or that Stakee is unsafe. For either service, verify the contract address and current withdrawal process, and only deposit funds you can afford to have at risk.

What does each service do better—and who should choose it?

Mantle’s main differentiator is the mETH receipt token and its potential use in other DeFi apps. Small withdrawals may take roughly 1–5 minutes, while larger requests are described as taking about 24 hours. Those are estimates subject to conditions and liquidity, not unconditional promises. Pick it only if you can tolerate delays and the possibility that a liquid token’s market value differs from the value of its underlying ETH.

Stakee’s differentiator is access to TON staking through Telegram or a web wallet, with a stated 1 TON minimum. It claims withdrawals take minutes and advertises a higher maximum APY, but the actual yield mechanics, fees and audit details are unclear. It also does not identify a liquid token for use elsewhere.

In short, Mantle better suits ETH holders who want liquid staking and can navigate DeFi risks. Stakee may suit TON holders who put interface convenience first and are willing to verify its terms carefully. If published fees, clear audit reports or guaranteed access to funds are essential to you, neither is an obvious fit.

Verdict: Mantle Restaking or Stakee?

Pick Mantle Restaking if you hold ETH, want mETH as a liquid staking token, and are comfortable with Ethereum, DeFi integrations and redemption delays. Its token and withdrawal paths are more clearly described, but the APY can change and full fee and audit details are not clearly published. Pick Stakee if you hold TON and want a Telegram-based staking interface, while understanding that its advertised yield is not guaranteed and its fees, yield mechanics and audit claims need verification. If you need fully transparent terms or guaranteed withdrawals, choose neither until those concerns are resolved.

Frequently asked questions

Which has the higher advertised yield?

No. Mantle Restaking displays a 5% APY, while Stakee advertises up to 25% and gives a 21% calculator example. Both rates can change, and neither should be treated as a guaranteed return.

Do both services give you a liquid token?

Mantle Restaking issues mETH for staking ETH and associates cmETH with restaking. Stakee does not identify a separate transferable liquid-staking token, so don’t assume you can use your staked TON elsewhere as a receipt token.

Which service lets you withdraw faster?

Mantle describes small redemptions as taking roughly 1–5 minutes and larger ones about 24 hours, subject to conditions and liquidity. Stakee claims withdrawals take minutes, but you should check the unstake screen and contract conditions before relying on that timing.

Which is clearer about fees and audits?

Neither publishes a complete fee schedule. Mantle also lists two audits without identifying the reports, while Stakee’s audit claims conflict and lack clear report details. Check the current contracts, fees and audit reports before depositing either asset.