Skip to content

Comparison · Updated

LlamaPay or Streamflow: Which Fits Your Payments in 2026?

Pick LlamaPay for recurring pay that accrues continuously across EVM chains. Pick Streamflow for Solana-focused vesting, airdrops, staking and token payouts.

LlamaPay logo

LlamaPay

Payments

Score 6.2 out of 10

TVL $2.05M · 22 chains

Streamflow logo

Streamflow

Payments

Score 6.2 out of 10

TVL $10.3M · 6 chains

Side by side

LlamaPay vs Streamflow at a glance

LlamaPay and Streamflow compared
 LlamaPayStreamflow
CategoryCrypto payment streaming protocolOn-chain token distribution platform
ChainsMore than 20 EVM networks, including Ethereum, Arbitrum and BaseService information focuses on Solana; broader network support needs confirmation
TVLAbout $2.0m (undated figure)About $10.3m (undated figure)
TokenNo LlamaPay token listedSTREAM
FeesService fees not published; network gas appliesFee amounts not published; network transaction fees apply
Security and auditsTwo audits listed, including a yAudit report for LlamaPay V2; verify deployment coverageTwo audits listed; scope, dates and contract versions are not specified
Ease of useSet up a stream with a wallet; recipients can withdraw accrued payConnect a compatible Solana wallet and configure the relevant token operation
Standout featureRecurring payments accrue continuously and can have an end date or run without oneVesting, token locks, airdrops, staking and batch payouts
Best forTeams and contributors managing recurring crypto compensationSolana projects distributing or managing tokens
How funds are handledSmart-contract payment tool; detailed custody terms are not publishedOn-chain workflows governed by contract rules

Do you need recurring pay or token distribution?

Choose LlamaPay if you need ongoing compensation rather than one-off token distributions. A payer sets a recipient, token amount and payment frequency, then the funds accrue continuously. The recipient can withdraw the accrued amount when they choose, subject to the stream and network setup. You can set an end date or create a stream without one.

Choose Streamflow if your job is to distribute or manage tokens through specific workflows. It offers vesting, locks, airdrops, staking and payouts, including batch distribution. That makes it a closer fit for a token launch or community allocation than a recurring salary stream. Streamflow also describes an SDK and branded portals, which may suit teams integrating token operations into other products. Neither is a conventional payroll service, so you remain responsible for recipient details, funding and any obligations that apply to your payments.

What will each one cost you?

Neither platform publishes fee amounts in the product details described here, so you cannot compare their service charges from a public fee schedule. Check the current terms in each app before creating a stream, vesting contract or airdrop. Do not assume an unpublished price means the service is free.

Budget for blockchain transaction costs too. LlamaPay transactions run on the selected EVM network, and Streamflow’s described workflows focus on Solana. Network fees can change with conditions, and the number of actions or recipients may affect the transactions needed. A recipient may also pay gas to claim funds from a LlamaPay stream, depending on how the claim is made. For a large distribution or a long-running stream, review transaction previews and test with a small amount before committing more.

Which is safer for your funds?

There is no clear safety winner based on the audit listings alone. Both list two audits, but an audit cannot guarantee that a contract is free of vulnerabilities or that every live deployment was reviewed. LlamaPay lists a yAudit report for V2; confirm that it covers the precise version and chain you plan to use. Streamflow’s audit names, dates, versions and scope are not specified, so look for reports that match the contracts you intend to interact with.

Both involve on-chain contracts, which means contract rules and the relevant blockchain matter to how funds move. With LlamaPay, verify the token, network, recipient and contract before funding a stream. With Streamflow, check recipients, amounts, schedules and lock or withdrawal conditions before signing. Keep your wallet recovery phrase private, and do not treat an audit as insurance or a promise that funds can always be recovered.

Which is easier to start with?

LlamaPay is the more natural starting point if you already use an EVM wallet and want recurring payments. Its basic flow is to enter the recipient, token amount and frequency, then approve and start the stream with a blockchain transaction. Recipients can claim accrued funds. Still, check that the exact token and contract are supported on your chosen chain, and carefully verify any alternate claim destination.

Streamflow is aimed at teams setting up token operations, not people looking for a basic payment app. You connect a compatible Solana wallet, choose a tool and configure its details. For vesting, check recipients, amounts, start time and release schedule; for airdrops, verify the full recipient list and totals. Its range of tools can mean more decisions to review before signing. Either way, try a small test transaction before using a large allocation.

Verdict: LlamaPay or Streamflow?

Pick LlamaPay if you want recurring crypto compensation that accrues continuously and need a tool listed across many EVM networks. It is the closer fit for salaries or contributor payments, provided you verify token support, fees and the exact contract deployment. Pick Streamflow if you are a Solana-focused team managing vesting, airdrops, staking, locks or batch payouts. Its broader distribution toolkit is not a substitute for recurring pay streams. Both list two audits, and neither publishes fee amounts in the product details described here, so verify costs and contract coverage before funding either one.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between LlamaPay and Streamflow?

LlamaPay lets a payer set a recipient, token amount and frequency; funds accrue in a stream for the recipient to withdraw. Streamflow is geared toward token distribution workflows such as vesting schedules, airdrops, locks, staking and batch payouts.

Which one has lower fees?

Neither publishes fee amounts in the product details described here. You should check the app’s current fees and account for network transaction costs before setting up a stream or distribution.

Which platform is safer?

Both list two audits, but an audit does not guarantee that funds are safe. LlamaPay lists an audit for V2, while Streamflow’s audit scope and contract versions are not specified; check that reports cover the exact contracts you plan to use.

Which should I choose if I need a specific blockchain?

LlamaPay lists more than 20 EVM networks, while Streamflow’s service information focuses on Solana despite a broader network list. Confirm support for the specific product, token and chain before you fund anything.