Skip to content

Comparison · Updated

Kelp or Stakee: Which Staking Service Fits You in 2026?

Pick Stakee if you specifically want a Telegram-based way to stake TON, but verify its contract, fees and withdrawal terms first. Kelp supports Ethereum restaking, yet the reported April 2026 bridge exploit makes checking the affected routes and current withdrawal status essential before you use it.

Kelp logo

Kelp

Liquid Restaking

Score 3.2 out of 10

TVL $839M · 1 chains

Stakee logo

Stakee

Liquid Restaking

Score 4.8 out of 10

TVL $23.0M · 1 chains

Side by side

Kelp vs Stakee at a glance

Kelp and Stakee compared
 KelpStakee
CategoryLiquid restaking protocolTON staking service
ChainEthereumTON
TVLAbout $839m; as-of date not publishedAbout $23m; as-of date not published
TokensrsETH for restaked positions; KERNEL governance tokenNo liquid-staking token identified
FeesClear fee schedule not published; Ethereum gas and any bridge or DeFi fees may applyFees not published; TON network costs may apply
Security and auditsTwo audits listed; bug bounty up to $250,000; bridge exploit reported in April 2026Audit claims conflict; clear report details not published
Ease of useWallet-based Ethereum deposits; requires familiarity with restaking and cross-chain riskTelegram bot or web wallet flow; 1 TON minimum advertised
Standout featurersETH is described as available across more than 10 chains and over 40 DeFi platformsTelegram-based TON staking with advertised daily rewards and automatic compounding
Best forExperienced Ethereum users who want rsETH and can verify current contract and bridge statusTON holders who want a Telegram interface and are prepared to check unclear terms
WithdrawalsWithdrawal timing and limits not publishedClaims withdrawals take minutes; detailed limits not published

What do Kelp and Stakee give you?

Kelp is for Ethereum users who want to restake ETH or supported liquid staking tokens and receive rsETH. The token is intended to keep a position usable in DeFi, and Kelp says rsETH is available across more than 10 chains and over 40 DeFi platforms. That flexibility comes with added contract, bridge and third-party protocol exposure.

Stakee is for TON holders who want to stake through a Telegram bot or connect a TON wallet on the web. It advertises daily rewards, automatic compounding and a 1 TON minimum. But it does not identify a separate liquid-staking token, so you should not assume your staked TON becomes a transferable asset for use elsewhere. Choose based on the network and product you actually need, not the headline yield or the word “liquid.”

What could each service cost you?

Neither service publishes a clear fee schedule. For Kelp, Ethereum gas is one cost, and bridging rsETH or using a lending or trading venue can add network charges, protocol fees and swap spreads. Its current dependable APR is not published, so advertised or displayed rewards should not be treated as fixed income.

Stakee also leaves important cost details open: it does not explain whether its advertised APY is before or after fees, how rewards are calculated, or what share reaches you. It advertises up to 25% APY, while its example calculator uses 21%; neither figure is a guaranteed net return. In both cases, inspect the transaction quote and terms before signing. With Stakee, the lack of fee and yield mechanics makes it especially hard to compare expected net rewards with other TON staking options.

Which is safer for your funds?

Kelp needs the more urgent safety check. It lists two audits and a bug bounty of up to $250,000, but those measures do not guarantee safety. A bridge exploit reported in April 2026 involved about $292 million in rsETH. Before you deposit, bridge or use rsETH, confirm which contracts and routes are affected and whether deposits and withdrawals are operating. Do not assume an audit or a liquid token makes an exit certain.

Stakee also has unanswered security questions. It makes conflicting claims about whether TON Core or CertiK audited its contract, without clear report details to confirm the scope, date or findings. Its claim that the contract handles funds is not a guarantee of recovery or immediate access. For either service, verify the contract address and withdrawal route independently and only risk funds you can afford to lose.

Which is easier to start with?

Stakee may be simpler to approach if you already use TON and want a Telegram or web-wallet flow. It advertises a 1 TON minimum and says you can request an unstake at any time, with withdrawals taking minutes. Treat that timing as a claim, not a guarantee: check the unstake screen, destination and expected completion before confirming. Stakee does not publish a withdrawal limit.

Kelp’s flow involves a compatible Ethereum wallet, a supported asset and a deposit that returns rsETH. Using rsETH on another chain adds bridging decisions and more contracts to assess. Kelp does not publish a minimum deposit or detailed withdrawal timing. The reported bridge exploit makes it particularly important to check current route status before taking any action. Neither product should be treated as a simple bank-like savings account; staking and restaking can expose your funds to contract and liquidity risks.

What does each service do better?

Kelp’s main distinction is its Ethereum restaking model: you deposit ETH or supported liquid staking tokens and receive rsETH, which Kelp describes as usable across a broad set of chains and DeFi apps. That can suit experienced users who specifically want a restaking position with DeFi integrations. But its reported bridge exploit is a major caveat, and the breadth of integrations also means more dependencies to check.

Stakee’s clearest draw is access to TON staking through Telegram or a web wallet, with a low advertised 1 TON minimum. Its headline yield may attract comparisons, but the service does not clearly explain its yield mechanics, fees or audit reports. If you want rsETH and understand Ethereum restaking, Kelp is the closer fit only after verifying current safety and withdrawal status. If you want a TON staking interface, Stakee fits that need better, provided you accept its unanswered terms and verify the route first.

Verdict: Kelp or Stakee?

Pick Kelp if you are an experienced Ethereum user who specifically wants rsETH exposure and can verify the current status of its contracts, bridge routes and withdrawals before acting. Its cross-chain integrations are useful, but the reported April 2026 exploit is a serious reason to pause. Pick Stakee if you hold TON and want a Telegram-based staking flow with a 1 TON advertised minimum. Do not rely on its up-to-25% APY or quick-withdrawal claims as guarantees; first check the contract, fees, yield terms and unstake route.

Frequently asked questions

Is Kelp safe to use after the bridge exploit?

No. Kelp lists two audits, but audits do not prevent every exploit or guarantee recovery. The reported April 2026 bridge exploit involving about $292 million in rsETH makes it especially important to confirm which contracts and routes are safe and whether withdrawals are operating.

Is Stakee’s advertised 25% APY guaranteed?

Stakee advertises up to 25% APY and says the rate can vary, so it is not a guaranteed return. It does not publish a fee schedule or clearly explain how the yield is generated, making it difficult to estimate your net rewards.

Which service gives you a liquid-staking token?

Kelp issues rsETH for supported ETH and liquid staking token deposits; Stakee does not identify a separate liquid-staking token. If you want a token to use in other DeFi apps, Kelp describes that use case, but its bridge incident requires extra caution.

What is the minimum deposit for each?

Stakee advertises a 1 TON minimum. Kelp’s minimum deposit is not published, so check its current deposit flow and terms before preparing a transaction.