Comparison · Updated
Clearstar or RockawayX: Which Fits Your DeFi Need in 2026?
Choose Clearstar for institutional DeFi advice and product operations; choose RockawayX if you want to assess a specific curated lending vault. They serve different needs.
Clearstar
Risk Curators
TVL $178M · 11 chains
RockawayX
Risk Curators
TVL $279M · 10 chains
Side by side
Clearstar vs RockawayX at a glance
| Clearstar | RockawayX | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | DeFi risk adviser and operator | On-chain asset manager and risk curator |
| What you use it for | Advice, product support and risk management; no retail deposit app | Curated lending strategies accessed through specific vaults |
| Networks | 11 listed: Flare, Base, Ethereum, Monad, Hyperliquid, Starknet, Katana, Arbitrum, Hemi, Polygon and Unichain | 10 listed: Ethereum, Solana, Monad, Pharos, Sei, Base, BNB Chain, Citrea, Etherlink and Plume Mainnet |
| TVL | Not published as a dated current figure | Not published as a dated current figure |
| Token | None listed | None listed |
| Fees | No standard rates or pricing formula published | Strategy-specific fees not published; check vault and network charges |
| Security and audits | No audits listed; custody arrangements are not clearly documented | No audits listed; verify the vault and underlying protocol separately |
| Ease of use | Contact the team to discuss an organizational mandate | Find and assess the specific vault and its terms |
| Custody and withdrawals | No standard custody model or self-service withdrawal terms published | Withdrawal terms vary by vault; confirm redemption conditions before depositing |
| Best for | Institutions, asset issuers and chains seeking DeFi advice or launch support | Experienced DeFi users considering curated lending exposure |
Are you looking for advice or a lending vault?
Clearstar is a service provider: organizations can seek DeFi risk assessments, product design and launch support, or ongoing market management. It describes work with chains, exchanges and asset issuers, including evaluating protocols and collateral or helping set up an institutional earn product. Its VALIS system and APB risk reports are part of the research and risk process it describes. You would discuss a mandate with the team rather than connect a wallet and deposit.
RockawayX is closer to a DeFi product route for users. It curates lending strategies through Morpho and other lending protocols, with strategies described as involving stablecoins, ETH, BTC and SOL. You need to evaluate a particular vault, not assume every asset or network is currently available. The basic choice is therefore not between two equivalent investment apps: Clearstar sells specialist services, while RockawayX may offer vault exposure to depositors.
What could each option cost you?
Neither publishes a standard fee schedule. For Clearstar, the price depends on the engagement, and the company does not publish a pricing formula. Before signing, agree in writing on the scope, fee and billing schedule, duration, renewal terms, and any third-party or integration costs. If Clearstar will operate a strategy or manage market parameters, clarify exactly what authority and work the fee covers.
RockawayX does not publish strategy-specific fees. Before depositing, check the vault for any curator or performance fee, the underlying lending protocol’s charges, and network gas. Ask whether any displayed yield is gross or net of fees and how it is calculated; lending yields can change and are not guaranteed. A fee comparison is only meaningful once you have the exact Clearstar proposal or RockawayX vault terms. If you cannot find the charges that apply to your use, do not treat a headline yield or general service description as the total cost.
Which is safer for your funds?
Neither lists audits for its own services, so neither has a published audit record to use as a deciding advantage. Clearstar describes a risk process that covers contract controls, financial exposures and dependencies involving collateral, oracles and protocols. That can help a client assess risks, but it is not an independent audit or a guarantee against losses. The company has not clearly documented its custody arrangements, so ask who controls assets and who has authority to act under any operating mandate.
RockawayX also has no audits listed. This does not establish whether an underlying lending protocol has been audited, so check the specific vault contract and protocol separately. Depositing into DeFi can expose you to contract failures, lending-market losses and delays or limits on exiting. Confirm the exact contract, deposit asset, network and redemption conditions through official project channels before committing funds. A curator’s risk management cannot eliminate those risks, and neither option should be treated as a guarantee of capital or returns.
Which is easier to start with?
Clearstar is easier to understand if you are an organization with a defined DeFi decision and want to discuss it with a specialist. It does not offer a consumer signup flow or wallet-based deposit experience, so individuals looking for a savings app should look elsewhere. Before engaging, establish the mandate, the services included and whether Clearstar will advise only or also take operating responsibility. Its listed networks are not a promise that every protocol or service will fit your project.
RockawayX requires more self-directed checking if you are considering a vault. Identify the exact strategy, network and deposit asset, then read its fees and withdrawal terms and verify the contract and underlying markets. Its network list does not mean every vault is live everywhere, and strategies may have different redemption conditions. The project does not publish one standard withdrawal speed or process. If you are new to DeFi lending, the need to assess these details makes RockawayX a less straightforward starting point than a conventional savings product.
Verdict: Clearstar or RockawayX?
Pick Clearstar if you represent an institution, asset issuer or chain that needs DeFi risk advice, product launch support or ongoing market management. Expect to negotiate a mandate and get fees, custody responsibilities and operating authority in writing. Pick RockawayX if you are an experienced DeFi user considering curated lending exposure and are prepared to check a specific vault’s contract, fees, underlying markets and redemption terms. Neither lists audits or publishes a standard fee schedule, so neither is an obvious choice if you require those assurances before engaging.
Frequently asked questions
Can you deposit crypto with Clearstar?
No. Clearstar provides advisory and operating services for organizations; it is not a self-service app for depositing crypto. RockawayX offers curated DeFi strategies through specific vaults, whose availability and terms you should verify.
Which one has published audits?
Neither lists audits for its own services. For a RockawayX vault, check the security information for the specific vault contract and underlying lending protocol as well; a curator does not remove smart-contract or market risk.
Which is cheaper?
Neither publishes a standard fee schedule. Clearstar fees depend on the mandate, while RockawayX fees can be strategy-specific; check any curator or performance fee, underlying protocol charges and network gas before proceeding.
Which networks do they support?
Clearstar lists Flare, Base, Ethereum, Monad, Hyperliquid, Starknet, Katana, Arbitrum, Hemi, Polygon and Unichain. RockawayX lists Ethereum, Solana, Monad, Pharos, Sei, Base, BNB Chain, Citrea, Etherlink and Plume Mainnet; a listed network does not mean every strategy is available there.