Comparison · Updated
Arrakis Modular or Kamino Liquidity: Which Fits You in 2026?
Pick Arrakis Modular for project-level, managed liquidity across several listed chains. Pick Kamino Liquidity for Solana users seeking automated liquidity positions or lending markets.
Arrakis Modular
Liquidity Manager
TVL $53.5M · 6 chains
Kamino Liquidity
Liquidity Manager
TVL $65.3M · 1 chains
Side by side
Arrakis Modular vs Kamino Liquidity at a glance
| Arrakis Modular | Kamino Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Onchain liquidity management for token issuers and projects | Solana liquidity management and lending markets |
| Chains | Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Plasma, Robinhood Chain and BNB Chain | Solana |
| TVL | About $53.5M; date not published | About $65.3M; date not published |
| Token | No token listed | KMNO |
| Fees | No general fee schedule published; confirm commercial terms | Fees vary by market; full schedule not established |
| Security and audits | Two audits listed; scope and dates not specified | Two audits listed; scope and dates not specified |
| Ease of use | Project-focused; requires reviewing deployment and vault terms | Solana wallet and SOL needed; review each position or market |
| Standout feature | Modular Meta Vault framework for managed market making | Automated range management, rebalancing and compounding |
| Best for | Token issuers seeking managed DEX liquidity | Solana users seeking liquidity tools or onchain borrowing |
| Other product details | Liquidity positions; confirm the exact chain, pool and vault | Liquidity positions plus collateralized borrowing |
What does each liquidity product let you do?
Arrakis Modular is the closer fit if you represent a token project and need help establishing or managing onchain liquidity. Its modular vault framework is designed for market-making strategies, and Arrakis describes the service as self-custodial. It is not positioned as a simple retail account where you deposit assets to earn a standard yield.
Kamino Liquidity is a Solana DeFi protocol for individual liquidity providers as well as users of its lending markets. Its tools can manage concentrated-liquidity ranges, rebalance positions and compound fees or rewards. You can also deposit collateral and borrow through lending markets. That flexibility comes with changing rates and market risks; automation does not guarantee a return or protect your deposit value.
Which chains and users fit each one?
Arrakis lists Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Plasma, Robinhood Chain and BNB Chain for its Modular product. That gives project teams multiple possible environments to explore, but do not assume every pool or DEX integration is live on every listed chain. Confirm the exact deployment, venue and wallet requirements for your intended token market before arranging a vault.
Kamino is listed on Solana only, so it suits you if your assets and activity are already on that network. You will need a compatible Solana wallet and SOL for transaction fees. The listed TVL figures are about $53.5 million for Arrakis Modular and about $65.3 million for Kamino Liquidity; their dates are not published, and TVL can change. Treat them as context, not a measure of safety or expected returns.
What could using Arrakis or Kamino cost you?
Neither publishes a complete general fee schedule in the stated details. For Arrakis, request written commercial terms for the proposed deployment. Ask about management or performance fees, setup costs, minimum commitments, transaction costs and any pool or protocol charges before authorizing a vault. The terms may depend on the arrangement and the market being served.
Kamino costs depend on the particular liquidity pool or lending market. Account for Solana transaction fees and any charges from the relevant market or underlying protocol. For lending, compare current supply and borrowing rates; for liquidity, consider how trading activity, your range and token prices affect realized outcomes. In either case, a displayed rate or yield is not necessarily your net return, and charges or market losses can change the result.
Which is safer for your funds?
Both projects have two audits listed, but neither audit count tells you by itself which contracts and versions were examined, when the work took place or whether reported issues were fixed. Check the audit documents against the exact contracts you plan to use. An audit is useful evidence, not a guarantee against bugs or losses.
Arrakis describes its liquidity service as self-custodial. Still, review who can change vault settings, what permissions you grant and how withdrawals work. Kamino involves Solana smart-contract and market risks; liquidity positions can lose value as prices move, and borrowing adds the risk of collateral liquidation under the market’s rules. Neither product is a bank deposit or a guaranteed-value account. Only commit funds you can afford to put at risk.
Which is easier to start with?
Kamino is likely the more direct starting point if you already use Solana and want to manage a liquidity position or inspect a lending market. Before depositing, confirm the assets, range strategy, current rates and transaction details in your wallet. For borrowing, understand the collateral rules and liquidation conditions, and keep enough SOL for network fees. Automated management can reduce manual adjustments, but you should still monitor market conditions.
Arrakis is a more involved choice for a project team. Expect to define the liquidity goal and review the proposed strategy, vault permissions, chain and pool deployment, then agree on commercial terms. Its broad chain list does not establish that your exact deployment is available. If you need a retail savings-style product, or need public upfront pricing before any discussion, neither is an obvious match; Kamino’s wallet-based entry is simpler, but still requires DeFi risk checks.
Verdict: Arrakis Modular or Kamino Liquidity?
Pick Arrakis Modular if you are a token issuer or project that needs managed onchain liquidity and wants to evaluate a self-custodial vault framework across its listed chains. Get the exact deployment, permissions and commercial terms in writing before committing funds.
Pick Kamino Liquidity if you use Solana and want automated concentrated-liquidity management, or access to collateralized lending markets. Its automation can handle range adjustments and compounding, but returns and lending conditions change. Both list two audits, and neither is risk-free; compare the contracts and product-specific terms before using either.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for an individual crypto user?
Arrakis Modular is aimed at token issuers and projects managing onchain liquidity, rather than people looking for a standard deposit-and-earn app. Kamino is more directly usable by Solana wallet holders, with liquidity tools and lending markets.
Does Arrakis Modular guarantee safe self-custody?
No. Arrakis describes its liquidity service as self-custodial, but that does not remove smart-contract, permission or liquidity risks. Review the precise vault, contracts, strategy permissions and withdrawal terms before committing funds.
Which has lower fees?
Neither publishes a complete general fee schedule in the stated details. Costs can depend on the specific arrangement, pool or market, so check the terms and potential network and protocol charges before depositing.
Which protocol has more audited contracts?
Both have two audits listed, but an audit count alone does not show whether the exact contracts you will use were covered or whether findings were resolved. Check the audit documents against the current deployment.