Ankr or Hipo: Which Staking Option Fits You in 2026?

Pick Ankr if you want to compare staking across several assets or also need blockchain APIs, RPC access or infrastructure tools. Its staking suite supports more than nine tokens, but availability and terms depend on the specific product. Do not assume that every chain covered by Ankr’s APIs also has a staking option.

Pick Hipo if you hold GRAM on TON and want a receipt token that may be usable in TON DeFi. You receive hGRAM when you stake, and rewards accrue through its value relative to GRAM. That use in other protocols is optional, not a guarantee of liquidity or a better return. Hipo is not a general staking service for other assets or chains. If you need published fees, withdrawal times or custody details before depositing, check those terms directly for either service.

Hipo advertises no staking fee, but that does not make every transaction free. You need TON to pay network fees, and using hGRAM in another DeFi app can add that app’s costs and risks. Hipo does not publish a complete fee schedule for every possible action, so review the app’s current terms before staking or exiting.

Ankr’s free starting option applies to Web3 API access, not necessarily to staking. Its staking fee schedule is not published, and commissions or other charges may vary by asset and product. Network gas can also apply when you stake, transfer a receipt token or redeem your position. Compare the net terms for the exact asset you plan to use; neither a headline fee nor an advertised reward rate tells you what you will receive after all costs.

Neither option makes your funds risk-free. Ankr lists two audits, but the scope and dates are unspecified. Its custody arrangements and licensing details are also not clear for each staking product, so check who controls the assets, which contracts were reviewed and how validator or slashing losses could affect you.

Hipo lists audit reports for its v1 and v2 contracts, with reports spanning October 2023 to April 2025. Those reviews are useful to examine, but they do not guarantee that a contract is bug-free or that you can always redeem at a particular rate. Hipo also carries hGRAM liquidity risk, and using hGRAM in another protocol adds that protocol’s risks. Before committing funds to either service, check the relevant contract version, exit terms and current liquidity.

Hipo has a more focused staking flow: you need a TON-compatible wallet with GRAM and enough TON for network fees, then stake GRAM to receive hGRAM. Hipo says hGRAM can be returned for GRAM and accumulated rewards, but it does not publish a guaranteed processing time or withdrawal limit. Review the current exit conditions before relying on quick access to your funds.

Ankr may be less straightforward if you only want to stake, because it offers a wider range of products and also serves developers. The wallet requirements, supported assets and transaction steps depend on the staking product you choose. That breadth is useful if you need more than staking, but you should first verify the exact asset and network. For either service, use the official app and check the transaction details before approving a wallet action.

Ankr’s advantage is breadth. Alongside liquid staking across multiple assets, it offers RPC and API access, node services, and tools for rollups or sidechains. That makes it worth considering if you are a developer or project team seeking infrastructure as well as staking. For an individual staker, however, the exact fees, withdrawal rules and custody details need checking product by product.

Hipo’s advantage is specialization. It focuses on GRAM staking on TON and gives you hGRAM as a liquid-staking receipt token; its advertised staking fee is zero, though network fees remain and rewards vary. Its displayed yearly reward figure is based on recent rounds, not a promise of future returns. Choose Hipo for this specific TON use case, not for cross-chain staking. If neither project publishes the details you need, wait until you can verify them rather than assuming favorable terms.